Bill O Riley losing advertisers. ...hmmmmmm

http://money.cnn.com/2017/04/03/medi...-bill-oreilly/

This could be the beginning of the end...the Anthony Weiner of talk news if you will.


.

It won't bother the lemmings.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/04/03/medi...-bill-oreilly/

This could be the beginning of the end...the Anthony Weiner of talk news if you will.


. Originally Posted by WTF

coming from CNN it just has to be true

coming from CNN it just has to be true Originally Posted by cptjohnstone

How about you google it dickhead.

I'm not making a moral judgement on O'Riley.

But once advertisers start leaving....that can be problematic.

problematic. Originally Posted by WTF

never have liked that word

its a shortcut to nowhere

its become of constant use only relatively recently

the word allows a twit to say something without saying anything

its annoying and humorless

if a real person uses a common pronoun, perhaps the word "he", or "she", some liberal twit might say, "my, that's problematic", thinking gender pronouns must be banned.

considering you insensitive, the twit will say, "that's problematic", so the twit doesn't have to tell you what they mean,

hell, the word problematic is insensitive and overused and humorless

If OReilly is guilty of such behavior, then he should suffer the consequences of his actions.

If not, then the Law, both Civil and Criminal, have ways of dealing with false accusers.

Yep.

Remember that next time you wantonly hurl accusations at anybody to the left of Attilla the Hun, asshole.

coming from CNN it just has to be true Originally Posted by cptjohnstone

OH, so the advertisers who are fleeing the O'Reilly Factor like rats from a sinking ship are really not doing it.

Actually, it's a media conspiracy.

Fucking goober.

Too much truck stop bingo apparently.

OH, so the advertisers who are fleeing the O'Reilly Factor like rats from a sinking ship are really not doing it.

Actually, it's a media conspiracy.

Fucking goober.

Too much truck stop bingo apparently. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Go get another snickers bar out of the swimming pool, Shit Eater!

You're not your self when you're hungry!

How about you google it dickhead.

I'm not making a moral judgement on O'Riley.

But once advertisers start leaving....that can be problematic. Originally Posted by WTF

I googled it, all MSM, again they are report the truth on a guy that reports their bull shit

never have liked that word

its a shortcut to nowhere

its become of constant use only relatively recently

the word allows a twit to say something without saying anything

its annoying and humorless

if a real person uses a common pronoun, perhaps the word "he", or "she", some liberal twit might say, "my, that's problematic", thinking gender pronouns must be banned.

considering you insensitive, the twit will say, "that's problematic", so the twit doesn't have to tell you what they mean,

hell, the word problematic is insensitive and overused and humorless Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

Well seeing how you seem incapable of putting together 2 plus 2

Problematic in this case means that if O'Riley continues to lose advertisers faster than he gains new ones for a prolonged amount of time...he could get canned.

How about you google it dickhead.

I'm not making a moral judgement on O'Riley.

But once advertisers start leaving....that can be problematic. Originally Posted by WTF

I googled it, all MSM same bullshit

FUCK Bill0, FUCK his advertisers, FUCK Fox and MSN. TURN THE fucking TV OFF, PEOPLE! fuckers!

FUCK Bill0, FUCK his advertisers, FUCK Fox and MSN. TURN THE fucking TV OFF, PEOPLE! fuckers!

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Just read Briebart on the internet right?

IFFOFRDB = Forrest Gump - ( the speed).

He likes nosepick.cum