now im convinced.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...l-warming.html

Now that's a reliable, sensible source of information.

...reliable, sensible... Originally Posted by fritz3552

ahahahahahahahahahahaha


Have you ever read any of his other posts?

Al Gore will be elated to hear he's got someone in his corner...

were do you find time to read this shit. Wait never mind I find time to read your shit tinfoil suit please with, tophat

you can read cheaper? you agree with charlie or not?

Here you go cheaper!!!

Well, it looks like MSNBC has finally found someone to take Keith Olbermann's spot.

charlie is in good company with the true believers. al gore,binladen,and fidel castro, all global warmers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fritz3552
...reliable, sensible...

ahahahahahahahahahahaha


Have you ever read any of his other posts?
__________________
we have yours..you make as much sense as cheaper. lol..he was talking about charle. lmao

Sickening. You guys don't challenge Global Climate Change data, theory, drivers, buffers, or anything sciency. You just divide people into groups based on them having similar opinions about an obvious fact.

Sickening. You guys don't challenge Global Climate Change data, theory, drivers, buffers, or anything sciency. You just divide people into groups based on them having similar opinions about an obvious fact. Originally Posted by Longermonger

LM - there's nothing to challenge because it's a hoax. It's all made up. There is no global warming or climate change. It was all made up statistics and lies to further a political agenda and to line the pockets of Algore and his fellow incestors in 'green' technology.

the earth is cooling.

Sickening. You guys don't challenge Global Climate Change data. Originally Posted by Longermonger

I would like to point out how absolutely impossible it would be to challenge Climate Change. Since the beginning of recorded history, the climate has changed just about every day. It gets hotter, it gets cooler. Yet, there always seems to be a snake oil salesman around, trying to stir up some fear:
______________________________ _______________________
New York Times (1881):

“This past Winter, both inside and outside the Arctic circle, appears to have been unusually mild. The ice is very light and rapidly melting …”
______________________________ ________________________
New York Times (1895):

“Geologists Think the World May Be Frozen Up Again.”
______________________________ ________________________
New York Times (1932)

“NEXT GREAT DELUGE FORECAST BY SCIENCE; Melting Polar Ice Caps to Raise the Level of Seas and Flood the Continents”
______________________________ __________________________
New York Times (1975)

“A Major Cooling Widely Considered to Be Inevitable.”
______________________________ __________________________
New York Times (1979)

“A puzzling haze over the Arctic ice packs has been identified as a byproduct of air pollution, a finding that may support predictions of a disastrous melting of the earth’s ice caps.”
______________________________ __________________________
I would love to challenge the 'Hockey Stick' data...which is not based on raw data at all (its been 'filtered'). Where is the raw data? The dog ate their homework. Allegedly, the raw data was lost when the 'researchers' moved to a new office building.

So I'm going to switch this around 180 degrees. If we are to completely change our way of life, in the name of 'climate change', somebody is going to have to produce data which Proves global warming/climate change/ozone depletion or whatever the hell they are calling it these days.

I believe we are going to take short break from all this nonsense...as some 'prominent scientists' were indeed caught falsifying data. The half-hearted 'investigations' of fraud are about over...and just about all the dust bunnies have been swept under the carpet...but these con men are going to go underground for a few years, before we see another push. I don't see a carbon tax in our near future (as recently as two years ago it seemed to be an absolute certainty). I even believe we may see a reversal of the wattage limits on bulbs, as more is learned about the problems with CFL's.

At its pinnacle, Global Warming had attracted both political parties...remember Newt and Nancy sitting on the couch together? Whenever both political parties line up together and claim 'we just have to do something', I get very concerned....somehow I get the feeling that my best interests are not at the forefront of their thought process. I'm glad its died down for now; and, quite frankly, we have enough genuine problems to keep ourselves occupied.

great post lacrew.