Remember Ken Starr?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/22/u...tarr-memo.html


Hmmmm, interesting take.


. Originally Posted by WTF

"Innuendo" from "anonymous sources" is not an indictable offense. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

So you agree, OJ didn't do it!! Originally Posted by themystic

So you agree, OJ didn't do it!! Originally Posted by themystic

OJ did it but was not convicted! Originally Posted by WTF

OJ wasn't convicted despite extant hard evidence let alone just "innuendo" with "no evidence". Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I agree about OJ.....I think there is a mountain of circumstantial evidence Trump has something going on with Putin/Russia. Maybe it is just an innocent bromance! Originally Posted by WTF

"Innuendo" from "anonymous sources" is not an indictable offense. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Didn't Starr have to step down as president of Baylor University?

Sex scandal and Murder cover up

Add him to the list of deplorables Originally Posted by themystic

Strange, since this WHOLE russia furball, is cause of the media's fascination with annonymous sources.. Originally Posted by garhkal

OJ wasn't convicted despite extant hard evidence let alone just "innuendo" with "no evidence". Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Agenda driven "spin" and innuendo is not "circumstantial evidence". The real criminal activity relates to whoever is sourcing these stories to the lame-stream media. Beneath every mendacious banner headline asserting collusion is a reference to an anonymous source accompanied by weasel words, qualifiers, to prevent a libel suit or to afford a plausible excuse in order to later deny that the story was a complete fabrication and lie.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering