Should BP reviews count for PA

This I believe will be controversial and prepared for it..
I say NO....
My reasoning is it gives somebody who is just dipping their toe in the water seeing low hanging fruit access to some of the best info ECCIE has to offer (Ros and ML)

My other thought here is how many of those girls ever convert to becoming a verified provider here and even the ones that do how low is the % of the sticking...low Imo.

The other concern is some guy reviews a unverified provider and how can we prove he went to actually see her and didnt just use it for PA.
So Ive got 3 reasons and maybe more...
What say you?
Now I believe hey fine you can review her but ya dont get PA with it.

Ok BD,
What about p411 gals? Or ter, tob, tna, gbn, or ave-x gals?
The underlying issue is that eccie is really only a regional board of lower and central Midwest.
On east coast for example, eccie is barely known and there are handfuls of other boards.
So how would eccie get other guys in other regions/boards to join if pa was only for eccie gals?
And how would non-eccie gals be noticed by eccie guys if guys didn't post reviews of non-eccie gals cause not worth the effort unless pa was earned.
Although you present a valid idea related to questionable reviews being posted, your proposed solution simply wouldn't even work here in kc as kc is a Backpage town with eccie a distant 2nd, 3rd or even 4th depending on how p411 and ter were ranked.

However, perhaps men's room could be a screened authorization before access, as a separate item than ros view. That would take lurkers out of men's room. The admin staff could prob figure that out easily, if they already haven't.

I do believe and dont quote me but I believe TER you pay a fee to join and the girls I believe are verified (not 100% sure) and 411 the guys are verified and assume the girls are as well.
So how those other boards are ran is their business and how secure they make their site as to who gets on and off is up to them.
But for a guy here who joins...dont know who he is...he reviews some BP girl and next thing wallah...you got access to the ML and ROS.
Kind takes away from those that are reputable hobbyists....imo

Need an alternative other than no pa.
Does not your presentation boil down to verifying the guys somehow?

Absolutely BP reviews should count. I always appreciate those will make the BP plunge and give me info that I am not going to go out and get myself on that site.

Regards

Drudge2425

should they count? the powers that be say yes!

i see exactly what you mead bd. but being as there are really only a handful of providers in the metro it boils down too 411 or bp girls!

like previously stated the Intel is informative but if no one reviews them then there is no way for it too be found out if there is a diamond in the rough!

as far as a new member first poster reviewing a bp only girl well maybe p/a shouldn't be given!

but established hobbyists i think should no question!

good topic btw kudos!

Is the goal in restricting reviews to screen out BP minesweeper bullshit or to protect the "value and sanctity" of PA?

Of course BP counts. That's one of the main purposes of reviews.

It's a way to get new girls on one's radar. Several verified girls have started there.

Let's flip this around...

At what point do repeated reviews of verified girls become pointless? How many times do you need a review of how good Kaylen sucks dick?

That being said, I believe that all reviews have some value.

WEll I knew when I posted this thread that guys who like BP girls or like to review them would say fuck no...I want PA

And I'm not saying we cant review them....but do they deserve PA?

The girl is not verified so they are still low hanging fruit...right?

And the argument you want to them reviewed so you can determine if you want to see them...I never said not to allow reviews...I'm saying once again no PA

I believe that all reviews have some value. Originally Posted by BobsAlias

Oh yeah they have value...but do the guy that did the review deserve PA....if so why?

Ok here is an example

Joe blow is new to the hobby?
Joe blow decides to see a unverified...risky BP girl
Joe Blow know nothing of the hobby safety, etiquette, etc etc
Joe blow finds Eccie and decides to join and write a review of said low hanging, unverified girl and writes a review.
You see the review and go see the girl yet you know nothing of this guy since he has never written a review...can you trust him?
Can you trust her?

Now Joe Blow has PA which access to private areas of Eccie....is that fair?

My point here is basically most of the girls here are verified by age, and/or another verified provider or hobbyist...but with BP she has no verification.

Look this is a discussion and we aint curing cancer here...

Massage only reviews shouldn't count for PA. Exception is a a Rub and tug from a known eccie participating massage provider.

Ok here is an example Originally Posted by BigDeal

Here's another "possible" example:
A provider wants PA so creates a male handle
Provider writes a review of some unknown BP girl in bumfuck Idaho (have you seen Idaho reviews)?
Provider now has PA


BTW ALL of the Idaho reviews are written by the same person!

Eventually a good mod should be able to sniff out the fishyness.

Massage only reviews shouldn't count for PA. Exception is a a Rub and tug from a known eccie participating massage provider. Originally Posted by royamcr

They don't. We reject them if no activities take place. The info is still appreciated, but you don't get PA for a regular massage with no extras.

I think that BP reviews hold more weight than getting 6 weeks PA for a rub and tug, but the other sites are definitely a big part of reviews on this board.

I wouldn't consider any girl from BP as low hanging fruit if they end up being stellar. Everyone starts somewhere and the majority of girls on here started on BP or something similar.