Some members have mentioned on my large number of "no" reviews. First of all, I thought the purpose of a review was to inform/warn other members of a provider that you have seen. I had no idea that there was a hypothetical limit on how many times you can warn fellow members of bad experiences. Sure, most of them were on BP, but still that's one place where girls seriously need to be reviewed anyway. One negative review of a BP girl is probably more helpful than 100 positive reviews of an Eccie girl. I can't help if I had bad experiences, I'm not gonna lie and post a positive review if I did not have a good experience.
It just happens that in my last "no" review, the provider threatened to punch me in the face if I got any nut on her skin. Somebody with that attitude shouldn't even be a provider. Getting nut on your skin, in your mouth, etc. is part of a providers job. Sheesh! Let's see what else: one provider no-showed the session, didn't return any calls or PM's for a week, then said I should make it my business to see her. Naw, I should make it my business to post a bad review. One more: provider refused to even perform a CBJ, just handed me a rubber, hopped on the bed and said "come on". Don't you think all of those deserve a "no" review? I do. So, do you guys think theres anything wrong with having a lot of "no" reviews?