Why are URLs being moved to ROS?

Sir Lancehernot's Avatar
There's a field in the open section of the review template for a URL, but I've noticed twice lately that the link has been moved to ROS. Wassup widdat?

Do URLs in non-review public postings require private tags?

If this is routine, seems like y'all could save yourself some work by deleting the URL field from the open section.
There's a field in the open section of the review template for a URL, but I've noticed twice lately that the link has been moved to ROS. Wassup widdat?

Do URLs in non-review public postings require private tags?

If this is routine, seems like y'all could save yourself some work by deleting the URL field from the open section. Originally Posted by Sir Lancehernot
This is a total guess, so take it with a grain of salt, but...


I believe they are removing URL's from the publicly viewed area and putting them in the ROS "if" they are links to web pages that compete with Eccie.
Sir Lancehernot's Avatar
Nope. A provider's (Bliss) personal website and a Fort Worth studio's (Red Table) website.
Yeah, that's what I meant.

Sorry I wasn't more clear earlier. The Eccie staff only allows URLS (for the publicly viewed area) to show Eccie or P411 links. All other URL's get moved to the ROS.