Encounter: Alana . . . what a sweetheart, but better clothed

Date: 12/28/2019
Name: Alana (aka Kimberly)
Phone: 913-370-4805
Email Address: -
URL / Website: https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/alana-es...as-city-372827
URL / Website: https://topeka.rubratings.com/113972
URL / Website: https://sipsap.com/model_page_cast.p...ent_id=711830&
URL / Website: http://topeka.skipthegames.com/femal...t/520038060220
URL / Website: https://harlothub.com/female-escorts...805-44971.html
URL / Website: https://www.escort-guide.ws/kansas-c...rly-26404.html
URL / Website: https://independent.com.kc.listcrawl...post/27886283/
URL / Website: https://milfy.com.kc.listcrawler.com/post/28057206/
City: Overland Park
State: Kansas
Address: Nice upscale hotel OP*
Activities: Drinks, Massage, BBBJCIM (plus anything you want, it's all on the table)
Hair Length and Color: Long Blonde
Age: 40's??
Smoking Status: I Couldn't Tell
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: She is a wonderful woman. MILF in clothes! Pretty face. Not sure how old she is. Everything lists her as 35, but she looked way, way older than me and I'm in my mid 40's. IF I had to guess I'd say she looks 48. None of her pictures are current. That's her face, but nothing like her body. Once the clothes came off it all fell apart. I was expecting and OK with some mommy damage, but she had a hughe flap of extra flesh just dangling around. Boobs are drained . . .I'd guess 36B...yes, I said B. Larger woman with small boobs for her size that sagged bad. I hate to say anything negative, because she is such a sweet lady. We talked, had drinks and I really enjoyed her time, but physically she is not for me.
Recommendation: Yes/maybe if you like what you see

satff edit: modify address, too specific-S31

I communicated extensively with her off SA and finally made a trip to Lawrence to meet her and got to the location, she asked me to hang tight while she get her daughter out of the house. Then got crickets!
So ended up seeing another provider in Lawrence while I was there...good for me. Sounds like I may be glad I didnt! Thanks for doing some minesweeping for us!

Thank you for the honest review! It’s too bad that when we give an honest review we get harassed , etc by some providers. I really appreciate the honest review and challenge more of these in the future.

I saw her in Lawrence a year ago. Nice lady but would not quit yapping. Kept killing the mood.

"what a sweetheart, but better clothed". That's really all I have to read...

Hey Guys She's a 40 some Milf and not a Runway model. Pretty face. I knew she wasn't a model going in. Had a good time and sorry if yours didn't as well as you wanted.

Hi, was not expecting a runway model, but I do appreciate truth in advertising.... Using current pictures from the last decade would help.

Hi, was not expecting a runway model, but I do appreciate truth in advertising.... Using current pictures from the last decade would help. Originally Posted by TX.eccie

+1
Knowing what she looks like and what to expect going in reduces the chances of a negative review when the provider isn't as advertised. Its no different than using fake pics if the pics they're using aren't current.

I'm always hesitant to post negative things about a provider's appearance when I've been "catfished" in the past but honestly...collectively...mayb e we all just need to stop doing that. We're not doing a service to anyone.

I agree. It would be easier if we had a choice for each review: (select one) She looks just like pic, it’s her but pics are old or it’s not the girl in the pic.

While I agree we shouldn't totally tear someone down for their appearance. I am sure they think the same of some of us. I do agree on posting pictures no older, than the 6 months we get for references. A goose and the gander kind of thing.

While I agree we shouldn't totally tear someone down for their appearance. I am sure they think the same of some of us. Originally Posted by TailHooked

Wrong analysis. Who cares what they think of our appearance or what we look like. We don't charge people to have sex with us. As long as we are the ones paying, a provider's appearance is clearly of much importance and certainly is information we all want to see in this forum.

I just try and say things as best as I can as I see them. Everyone has different preferences....I select based on my personal preference, and I expect what u see in person is close to what I see I'm pictures.

I've been beat-up online but many other hobbiest when I've been brutally honest in the past. I even had one provider town me down based on one of my reviews. We talked and I told her as long as her pictures are real/current she had nothing to worry about ... She chose still not to visit. I believe I may have saved some time and money on that one not having to find out her pictures were overly dated.

Honestly I wish more reviewers were open and honest. Send like everyone wants to brag about how great they always have it.... But we know that can't always be true.

I do lots of research.... And even after reading and searching I've still taken too many for the team.

Wrong analysis. Who cares what they think of our appearance or what we look like. We don't charge people to have sex with us. As long as we are the ones paying, a provider's appearance is clearly of much importance and certainly is information we all want to see in this forum. Originally Posted by golard

+1, In many cases looks is part of what's being paid for. Doesn't matter what the client looks like.

Hey TX Eccie have you talked to her since?