Encounter: First visit to Dallas, not overly impressed compare to the hype

johndoe1979's Avatar
Date: Early February
Name: Jay
Address and Phone: -
Address: Nagoya Hinez
Phone: 214-812-9131
City: Dalals
State: Texas
Email Address: N/A
URL / Website: -
Activities: Table shower, CBJ, MPFSC, cleaned up, she showered, cuddled and chatted
Hair Length and Color: Blonde, past shoulder length
Age: 30-40
Smoking Status: Smoker
Ethnic Background: Korean
Physical Description: Nice looking, generally thin, very tall for asian. decent B cup. not much of an ass, very tan (I hear she lives in Hawaii.) VERY loose tummy
Recommendation: Yes
BiggD6's Avatar
You sound like a no, but you say yes for recommendation. Just checking.
Dickey9090's Avatar
Next time just ask one of us. We will direct you the the slut you desire
Chung Tran's Avatar
a couple of items naturally stand out from your review.




I received wonderful service from Jay, as did everyone else who has reviewed her.
Maybe he doesn’t want BB from someone with high BB mileage. I would have opted for CFS with her as well
Chung Tran's Avatar
Maybe he doesn’t want BB from someone with high BB mileage. I would have opted for CFS with her as well Originally Posted by Asianhobbyist
that is possible. but when your service is reported to be far below what every other guy stated, your review should examine that reasoning. his review makes it seem like CBJ is normal with Jay, but he is the ONLY guy to get a CBJ.. and one of a handful to get CFS.

my criticism is in regard to lack of detail, I don't care if the reviewer prefers CBJ, CFS. just mention that.. simple enough.
Ghostrider's Avatar
Actually it reads more like a comparison from Houston to Dallas. There are none unfortunately. Dallas is light years better.
There are a couple of "reviewers" that post over the top reviews that lack credibility. I consider them "paid advertisement". Regular reading will show you who those are. Jay does have a bit of tummy that is distracting. You may have caught her on a bad day, as she is quite good.
Ghostrider's Avatar
There are a couple of "reviewers" that post over the top reviews that lack credibility. I consider them "paid advertisement". Regular reading will show you who those are. Jay does have a bit of tummy that is distracting. You may have caught her on a bad day, as she is quite good. Originally Posted by Rowdy0326
I guess that’s where I differ than most. I am not going to report a flabby stomach, mole on her ass, and most of the time Tattos because I am more focused on getting what I paid for so my review focuses on the service and IOP! Maybe we should count teeth, take a measuring stick with a hobby bag so every detail can be noted. No thanks. Keep those reviews to yourself
I guess that’s where I differ than most. I am not going to report a flabby stomach, mole on her ass, and most of the time Tattos because I am more focused on getting what I paid for so my review focuses on the service and IOP! Maybe we should count teeth, take a measuring stick with a hobby bag so every detail can be noted. No thanks. Keep those reviews to yourself Originally Posted by Ghostrider
I disagree with this statement completely. If you dont want to give a fair representation of the physical aspects of the provider, your review is completely worthless. This nonsense need to stop. One doesn't have to be rude about it, but need to mention it. To me, this is what differentiates a hobbyist from a promoter. Hobbyist looks out for other hobbyists.
Ghostrider's Avatar
DG. I am good with the disagreement and assessment but I can honestly tell you that if I thought for a second that a fellow Hobbiest would not have fun with the gal I just reviewed. Then they would have gotten a No. I am fairly specific with their services that may or may not be the normal session. I even go so far as stating that if “this type of provider” you may be looking for, then pass on the gal I reviewed. Pretty simple. Everyone has their own styles. I have mine and you have yours but don’t come back and say her left breast was larger than the right one and I failed to mention that in the review.
I think the "tummy" statement is a little over the top … she certainly is not a spinner, but I would not describe her as fat either, but with a little bit of belly. After all, she is not a 20 - something and I had read other reviews so was not surprised at all. I found her to be most accommodating, eager to please and a very happy girl … my experience at worst was an 8 or 9
johndoe1979's Avatar
Didn't mean to cause the debate here. I put yes because the facility was good, she was nice and her IOP was great as I mentioned. But I also have to honest about other aspects. As regards to the BB comment, I always go covered. Doesn't matter if BB was on the menu or not. That's doesn't bother me. May be next time I stop in Dallas, I'll check with you for the latest Intel on the young 20 something spinner...