I didn't see any evidence of that. I think it is just a seasoned provider helping a new provider.
Originally Posted by RocketSurgeon
Really RS. You want hard evidence in a hobby that has all sort of twists and turns, pimps everywhere and provider that tell all kinds of stories.
When an ad that talks about one girl, with pictures of different girls: it is suspicious. When multiple comments match: it is suspicious.
When a lady has a crown tattoo: it is suspicious.
We can go on, and on, and on.
Give us a break; it isn't evidence. That is the wrong word, and way of thinking.
All he asked for was for us to pay attention to the wording and decide for ourselves. Your assumption, that it was a seasoned provider helping a new provider, is just an assumption: you don't know that.
I am not saying your assumption is wrong - or right, and I am not saying that the thought that there is a pimp involved is wrong - or right.
Hey guys, we don't know: it is OK to say look at this -
this is supicious, let's make a note of this and wait for more information. That is a fair way to gather information without drawing final conclusions before we have enough information.
Or would you rather just think with your little head: wow that girl looks hot, she must be OK.
Good grief, let us all learn to think about what is going on out there.