If you ever wondered about the narrative of the LSM...

This story from the HUFF PUFF is a classic....about Trump naming wrong city. The story says...NO CLEAR MOTIVE...WTF!!
These fuckers are not only disingenuous and shameless THEY are happy that a radical left winger like that POS did this....

“What you ignore, you empower. And what you condone, you own. But too many…stop the damage at those who are being maligned, and those who should stand up against it

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/dayto...b0aca34121af4f

No mention of trump naming the wrong city.
If you are so sure of the motive and so offended by the fact that the "huff" is reporting what they were told by city officials then maybe this deserves a double foot stomp. So now reporting what is said becomes someone's "narrative" as opposed to what actually happened? Just because you see everything through hate fractured lenses, you think..no, you know everyone does.
Why didn't the "huff" publish what you think they should (HS)?
How the fuck can you blame the paper for reporting the real story as told by the police?
Funny how anyone who says something you don't like becomes the "left's narrative"?

What the fuck would you put in a story when the people investigating the case said no clear motive?
No reason to answer that. We know what you would do.
Make something up and/or claim the left had subverted the narrative.

This story from the HUFF PUFF is a classic....about Trump naming wrong city. The story says...NO CLEAR MOTIVE...WTF!!
These fuckers are not only disingenuous and shameless THEY are happy that a radical left winger like that POS did this....

“What you ignore, you empower. And what you condone, you own. But too many…stop the damage at those who are being maligned, and those who should stand up against it

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/dayto...b0aca34121af4f Originally Posted by bb1961

I will comment MUNCHY...I don't expect you to understand with your liberal blinders on.
They plainly said the motive was unclear...HEAD LINE OF THE STORY!!
What a crock of shit...

Almost 36 Hours After Dayton Massacre, Shooter’s Motive Still Not Clear


This says other wise...

"On social media, the suspect’s biography started to emerge. On his Twitter page, reviewed by Heavy, he described himself as “he/him / anime fan / metalhead / leftist / i’m going to hell and i’m not coming back.” He wrote on Twitter that he would happily vote for Democrat Elizabeth Warren, praised Satan, was upset about the 2016 presidential election results, and added, “I want socialism, and i’ll not wait for the idiots to finally come round to understanding.” The Greene County Board of Elections lists his party as “Dem

What's that you said about not having any idea of his ideology...doesn't take much detective work!!
MUNCHY...MUNCHY...you're going to have to do better than that.

Do better? You haven't refuted anything I said. You haven't added anything to what I've already pointed out is wrong with your misconceptions.

You can't inform those who can't learn.
If I have to explain the police are investigating and the "huff" is reporting.....I'm not going to.

It's not that I can't, it's that you aren't worth the time. I knew you would comment, you can't help it.

I asked this question before, but you won't answer it.

We'll try one more time. If you can't/won't answer it, just say so.
I'll even let you have the last word.

If the police/officials are telling you, the "huff" reporter, that they are unsure of the motive, what are you going to tell the editor?
That the police are lying to you?
That you've decided the shooter's blog explains everything and that the editor should publish the headline you think is appropriate?
A smart and up and coming cub reporter might start his own investigation and do a thorough search of the possible facts so he doesn't look stupid if more evidence is uncovered.

Unlike the guy who stakes everything on a guess seeing only the info that backs the story he was too lazy to research.
He was set on claiming a reporter of news was supposed to make the news.
All this while violating most of the ethical principles of responsible journalism.
And because he lacks them, he doesn't understand them, recognize them, or see a need for them.

Yes bb,they plainly said the motive was unclear. But only because the people doing the investigating told them that. Because they were told that, that was the headline.

Only a trumpy can believe they know more than professionals in the many fields involved in something like this. Based on a profile that by their own story, is just starting to emerge.

Yeppers sport. That must be a wrap. Because the perp had to have put it all in his blog. Admit it. You saw "dem" and it was case closed.

And now you start to lie and backtrack. I didn't say anything about ideology.
You know, that's just another easily provable lie by you. I only used the term motive, like you did.
The police said the motive is unclear. You seem to see something because you want to.

That means after examining the same info you have (plus more probably), THE MOTIVE IS UNCLEAR to the pros.

That's on top of your misunderstanding what the "huff's" role in all this is supposed to be.

To report, not make up the story(you know, that would be fake news).

I will comment MUNCHY...I don't expect you to understand with your liberal blinders on.
They plainly said the motive was unclear...HEAD LINE OF THE STORY!!
What a crock of shit...

Almost 36 Hours After Dayton Massacre, Shooter’s Motive Still Not Clear


This says other wise...

"On social media, the suspect’s biography started to emerge. On his Twitter page, reviewed by Heavy, he described himself as “he/him / anime fan / metalhead / leftist / i’m going to hell and i’m not coming back.” He wrote on Twitter that he would happily vote for Democrat Elizabeth Warren, praised Satan, was upset about the 2016 presidential election results, and added, “I want socialism, and i’ll not wait for the idiots to finally come round to understanding.” The Greene County Board of Elections lists his party as “Dem

What's that you said about not having any idea of his ideology...doesn't take much detective work!!
MUNCHY...MUNCHY...you're going to have to do better than that. Originally Posted by bb1961

Do better? You haven't refuted anything I said. You haven't added anything to what I've already pointed out is wrong with your misconceptions.

You can't inform those who can't learn.
If I have to explain the police are investigating and the "huff" is reporting.....I'm not going to.

It's not that I can't, it's that you aren't worth the time. I knew you would comment, you can't help it.

I asked this question before, but you won't answer it.

We'll try one more time. If you can't/won't answer it, just say so.
I'll even let you have the last word.

If the police/officials are telling you, the "huff" reporter, that they are unsure of the motive, what are you going to tell the editor?
That the police are lying to you?
That you've decided the shooter's blog explains everything and that the editor should publish the headline you think is appropriate?
A smart and up and coming cub reporter might start his own investigation and do a thorough search of the possible facts so he doesn't look stupid if more evidence is uncovered.

Unlike the guy who stakes everything on a guess seeing only the info that backs the story he was too lazy to research.
He was set on claiming a reporter of news was supposed to make the news.
All this while violating most of the ethical principles of responsible journalism.
And because he lacks them, he doesn't understand them, recognize them, or see a need for them.

Yes bb,they plainly said the motive was unclear. But only because the people doing the investigating told them that. Because they were told that, that was the headline.

Only a trumpy can believe they know more than professionals in the many fields involved in something like this. Based on a profile that by their own story, is just starting to emerge.

Yeppers sport. That must be a wrap. Because the perp had to have put it all in his blog. Admit it. You saw "dem" and it was case closed.

And now you start to lie and backtrack. I didn't say anything about ideology.
You know, that's just another easily provable lie by you. I only used the term motive, like you did.
The police said the motive is unclear. You seem to see something because you want to.

That means after examining the same info you have (plus more probably), THE MOTIVE IS UNCLEAR to the pros.

That's on top of your misunderstanding what the "huff's" role in all this is supposed to be.

To report, not make up the story(you know, that would be fake news).


Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

WOW. That's a great little tirade on the fine upstanding journalistic integrity of the reporter of this "piece" from the HuffPo.

Unfortunately it falls flat on it's face with the cute little editorial thrown in towards the end.

While he called the shooters “evil” and “barbaric,” he failed to blame the event on Americans’ access to guns or on his own racist and divisive rhetoric.

Journalistic integrity and reporting on "facts" alone my ass. It's just another in a long line of HuffPo Trump hit pieces and trying to deflect from this incident to the POTUS as well as guns and racism. They couldn't help themselves and it shows their partisan bias through and through.

If no motive is known, then why call out Trump for not citing himself as blame. I call bullshit on your protection of this "cub reporter".

And as for the earlier reference to calling out Trump for misnaming the city, it was and still is right with the headlines as an associated story. It would have been easy to mistake it as part of this one.

On point: The WAPO today "Don't blame mental illness, video games"
First WTF , the OPINION piece goes on to try to discredit Big-T
Second most shooters undiagnosed , but 75 % normal WHAT okay I'm not a doctor BUT theres something wrong mentally with them
Anytime there's no reporters name on the tagline its more RHETORIC Political haters , to push the socialist agenda and people really fall for the idiocy
Y'all should read UNFREEDOM OF THE PRESS

On point: The WAPO today "Don't blame mental illness, video games"
First WTF , the OPINION piece goes on to try to discredit Big-T
Second most shooters undiagnosed , but 75 % normal WHAT okay I'm not a doctor BUT theres something wrong mentally with them
Anytime there's no reporters name on the tagline its more RHETORIC Political haters , to push the socialist agenda and people really fall for the idiocy
Y'all should read UNFREEDOM OF THE PRESS Originally Posted by rexdutchman

CNN is the worst. I compared NBC.ABC and CNN news. They don't even bother to hide their bias against President Trump anymore. Americans have enough intelligence to see thru that bullshit. Trump was spot on to say "fake news."

Impeachmints are the new Kool-aid narrative!!!!

You got a fresh mouth? No? Then try these:

I do hope Pelosi and House impeach Trump.

It will be a huge political error.
and nominate a Sanders Warren leftist Socialist Loon ticket for 2020.
we will see!!!

It doesn't matter who they nominate...they're hanging all their hopes on the terrible shooting, but only the El Paso NOT the Dayton OH...they are in the full nothing to see here(damage control) mode on Dayton as in Shitcago. Hell the shooting in N. Commiefornia just a couple of weeks ago disappeared from the news.
Everyone of the LSM are accomplices in this shameless behavior.
Joe Scumbro's bitch said she hopes the is the traction they need.

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb...n-get-traction

That is why I pointed out the hypocrisy of the HUFF PUFF article...fuck the headline starts the false narrative and builds on it.

Do better? You haven't refuted anything I said. You haven't added anything to what I've already pointed out is wrong with your misconceptions.

You can't inform those who can't learn.
If I have to explain the police are investigating and the "huff" is reporting.....I'm not going to.

It's not that I can't, it's that you aren't worth the time. I knew you would comment, you can't help it.

I asked this question before, but you won't answer it.

We'll try one more time. If you can't/won't answer it, just say so.
I'll even let you have the last word.

If the police/officials are telling you, the "huff" reporter, that they are unsure of the motive, what are you going to tell the editor?
That the police are lying to you?
That you've decided the shooter's blog explains everything and that the editor should publish the headline you think is appropriate?
A smart and up and coming cub reporter might start his own investigation and do a thorough search of the possible facts so he doesn't look stupid if more evidence is uncovered.

Unlike the guy who stakes everything on a guess seeing only the info that backs the story he was too lazy to research.
He was set on claiming a reporter of news was supposed to make the news.
All this while violating most of the ethical principles of responsible journalism.
And because he lacks them, he doesn't understand them, recognize them, or see a need for them.

Yes bb,they plainly said the motive was unclear. But only because the people doing the investigating told them that. Because they were told that, that was the headline.

Only a trumpy can believe they know more than professionals in the many fields involved in something like this. Based on a profile that by their own story, is just starting to emerge.

Yeppers sport. That must be a wrap. Because the perp had to have put it all in his blog. Admit it. You saw "dem" and it was case closed.

And now you start to lie and backtrack. I didn't say anything about ideology.
You know, that's just another easily provable lie by you. I only used the term motive, like you did.
The police said the motive is unclear. You seem to see something because you want to.

That means after examining the same info you have (plus more probably), THE MOTIVE IS UNCLEAR to the pros.

That's on top of your misunderstanding what the "huff's" role in all this is supposed to be.

To report, not make up the story(you know, that would be fake news).


Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

The left is being forced to admit what you are blind to.
It just took some shaming to force them to admit the obvious, maybe you will too

As Howard Cosell said...Down goes MUNCHY!!
As long as you have a parachute MUNCHY you can get shot down over and over and still survive.
https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/201...uries-process/

DPST's will never permit facts to interfere with their idiotology narrative.

You got a fresh mouth? No? Then try these:

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

More recycled old shit Yssup? Does the left have any original thoughts.