curious about stripper names

why no names posted in that forum when they are used in every other one? always first initial only?

It's suppose to be for discretion, but it is stupid because in order to get your review approved, you have give the physical discription of the dancer in detail, which any dummy can figure who the dancer is by going to the club and comparing the first letter of the name and description. Then, go up to her and ask for the same service. One reason why I quit doing SC reviews.

I could give so much intel on this subject but seems senseless & I know I would be getting DM'ed like crazy, people looking for more info off the thread. Strippers that participate in "activities" are providers just like the rest, why protect identity?

WTFE, no prob - just curious of the logic or lack there of.

There is no logic to the reviews, but I do see the reason for the faint anonymity. Strippers may do the activities, however, they do not advertise they they do it like providers do, so there is that.

It's been the policy for as long as I've been a member here. It used to be more strictly enforced when Bushaholic was a mod, as he was a frequent SC visitor and somewhat of an "expert" in the field.

The theory is that SC Management reads this site, and blatantly connecting activities with stage names could get the girl fired. So, the masked name is intended to protect the girl by giving her a degree of "plausible deniability". The SC forum is the only one I know of here where reviews could get a girl in trouble with her employer. It's been traditional to confine full stage names to PMs, and be sure the person asking is a well-known board member, as it could be an SC manager with an account here.

They are all named Diamond and Princess and Bambi and Candy and Jade anyhow anyway, aren't they?