Date: 1/6/2020
Name: ShimmerBaby
Phone: 6605309426
Email Address: -
URL / Website: https://www.eccie.net/viewprovider.php?id=55538
City: Kansas City
State: Missouri
Address: -
Activities: Body worship, breast play, daty, CBJ,CG,BBBJ, Missionary, cuddling
Hair Length and Color: Long brunette
Age: 23
Smoking Status: Smoker
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: She is very pretty, awesome B cups, pink tasty nipples, responsive, very nice attitude, skinny, 5'4", round small butt. Hope to see her again!
Recommendation: Yes
staff edit: add ROS per OP-S31
- mkffuller
- 01-06-2020, 07:41 PM
- ans87ecc
- 01-06-2020, 09:05 PM
Congrats on meeting her!
- Guest090920
- 01-06-2020, 10:50 PM
The Rest of the Story: -
Thank you for submitting an encounter report. Your ROS section is inadequate compared to the standard for which PA credit is given since the site began operations.
You MUST include should the following in your REST OF STORY section:
If you can answer the following, you have written a good ROS
Describe the setup of the appointment. By email, phone or text messages
Was there a screening process? If so, describe it
Describe what the incall location looked like, ie: was it clean, messy etc
Was the location of the incall in a safe area, did you feel safe
How did the provider appear during the session? Was she into it or seemed to just go through the motions
While it is not necessary to write about all the graphic gory details, you should include the activities in general that occurred in the order they occurred
Finally, after the session is over what happened before you left, conversation etc
Send a PM to me with more details that satisfy the criteria listed above and I will edit the report and approve for PA credit if enough details are provided or I can reject the report for insufficient ROS details, your choice.
Thank you for submitting an encounter report. Your ROS section is inadequate compared to the standard for which PA credit is given since the site began operations.
You MUST include should the following in your REST OF STORY section:
If you can answer the following, you have written a good ROS
Describe the setup of the appointment. By email, phone or text messages
Was there a screening process? If so, describe it
Describe what the incall location looked like, ie: was it clean, messy etc
Was the location of the incall in a safe area, did you feel safe
How did the provider appear during the session? Was she into it or seemed to just go through the motions
While it is not necessary to write about all the graphic gory details, you should include the activities in general that occurred in the order they occurred
Finally, after the session is over what happened before you left, conversation etc
Send a PM to me with more details that satisfy the criteria listed above and I will edit the report and approve for PA credit if enough details are provided or I can reject the report for insufficient ROS details, your choice.
- mkffuller
- 01-06-2020, 11:59 PM
Congrats on meeting her! Originally Posted by ans87eccThanks man, your review of her was helpful to choose her. It was hard to arrange the meeting, but it's also rewarding. She didn't offer any kissing though
- ans87ecc
- 01-07-2020, 12:09 AM
Before the our first encounter, she told me kissing was conditional. I never asked her on what, but we ended up kissing so I didn't tempt fate and debate it.
- Wolfhound
- 01-07-2020, 03:28 PM
- ans87ecc
- 01-07-2020, 03:42 PM
- cw21467
- 02-24-2020, 09:23 PM
She ghosted me today... twice. Had a 10am incall scheduled but she went silent once I texted her when I was nearby. Then this afternoon she apologizes and says she was "in the hospital all morning with no phone access"... but wanted to meet up this evening. I asked if she'd do an outcall this time and she agreed but then never showed up.
Is she worth chasing?
#12 - In our review forums, be mindful of the 'maturity' of threads you are posting to, ie. the date of the last item posted. We ask that you refrain from posting to a review in which the last post was made 30 or more days ago. Some exceptions may apply if you are providing relevant, valuable or updated information about the provider, but as a general rule of thumb, this can best be accomplished by writing a new review altogether and avoiding the bumping of old ones. This applies to our review forums, in particular, as discussion threads are often allowed to flow for an unspecified length of time.
You should have created a thread in the Coed Discussions forum. closing-S31
Is she worth chasing?
#12 - In our review forums, be mindful of the 'maturity' of threads you are posting to, ie. the date of the last item posted. We ask that you refrain from posting to a review in which the last post was made 30 or more days ago. Some exceptions may apply if you are providing relevant, valuable or updated information about the provider, but as a general rule of thumb, this can best be accomplished by writing a new review altogether and avoiding the bumping of old ones. This applies to our review forums, in particular, as discussion threads are often allowed to flow for an unspecified length of time.
You should have created a thread in the Coed Discussions forum. closing-S31