How can any judge approve of identity theft???
https://theconservativeopinion.com/b...qKTzxwZKYN2MIY
How can any judge approve of identity theft???
https://theconservativeopinion.com/b...qKTzxwZKYN2MIY Originally Posted by gfejunkie
he opposition writes:It's a double-edged sword. Should states be allowed to thwart federal immigration laws by declaring themselves sanctuary states?
In dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer, writing for the court’s liberal wing, said U.S. immigration law gave federal authorities the sole responsibility to police fraud committed to obtain eligibility to work.
The law “reserves to the federal government—and thus takes from the states—the power to prosecute people for misrepresenting material information in an effort to convince their employer that they are authorized to work in this country,” Justice Breyer wrote.
Another liberal interpretation of what they want - total federal government control.
It is explicit in the Constitution -
The Tenth Amendment, which makes explicit the idea that the federal government is limited to only the powers granted in the Constitution, has been declared to be a truism by the Supreme Court.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
it is a liberal dissenting opinion. And not grounded in the Constitution. Originally Posted by oeb11
The specific issue is not immigration.
It's criminal identity theft and criminal fraud. I don't understand why this wasn't cleary dealt with correctly in lower court, let alone some justices dissented. Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter