Or caught COVID from any Dallas AMP? Curious what the risks are, here. And just as an aside, there's a new YouTube video where a Dr. Kory speaks before a Senate panel about a proven cure and preventative for COVID. It's called ivermectin. I would suggest that anybody putting themselves at risk at AMPs take some. Veterinary versions exist on Amazon if your doctor won't prescribe it for you. Of 800 health care workers who took it as COVID prophylaxis, none got sick. Of 400 who did not take ivermectin, 58% of them got sick. Search for Dr. Kory on YouTube.... Originally Posted by MongreFYI.... Prophylaxis does not equal cure. The two words are not interchangeable. It is one or the other - or neither. Also, an uncontrolled test of 800 people (no matter their role) is not proof of anything. This drug is used to treat parasitic infections and is not recommended for the treatment of COVID. This was a sham hearing chaired by an idiot Republican Senator touting unproven alternative treatments to COVID . The testimony in the hearing was widely derided by actual experts in the field.
FYI.... Prophylaxis does not equal cure. The two words are not interchangeable. It is one or the other - or neither. Also, an uncontrolled test of 800 people (no matter their role) is not proof of anything. This drug is used to treat parasitic infections and is not recommended for the treatment of COVID. This was a sham hearing chaired by an idiot Republican Senator touting unproven alternative treatments to COVID . The testimony in the hearing was widely derided by actual experts in the field. Originally Posted by jack_hillSorry JH, but successful prophylaxis, if applied widely, DOES end the pandemic. But it's not just good at preventing the disease, ivermectin successfully TREATS the disease if caught early. Secondly, this WAS a controlled test and just one of several, and backed by numerous uncontrolled but convincing outcomes in various countries. Third, that it is not recommended was exactly the point of the hearing. If something is not recommended and you reject it because it's not recommended, then isn't that some kind of circular stupidity? That fact that it is primarily intended for parsitic infections is irrelevant, isn't it, if it works against viruses? Its antiviral uses have been known for decades. It is nothing new. Read up on it before you utter garbage. The hearing is not a "sham" just because it is called by a senator desperate to bring the truth to light, or because it is widely derided by the powers that be. At this point, the authorities have every reason to suppress knowledge of effectiveness of ivermectin, since, if effective, then it is THEY who are responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands. The "widely derided" claim, even if true, is therefore irrelevant given the culpability of those "experts". I have followed the ivermectin story in relation to COVID since its inception over 6 months ago and it is compelling. Discussing this subject on this venue is absurd, of course, but fools should be answered.
Thought i read here or on oh2 someone said “he caught the shit” and had been visiting amps and called them. Something like that. Hasnt stopped my thricely visits to any amp and i havent caught it. Figured I would but nope. Originally Posted by Doug4343You read it on OH2.. From our old banned ECCIE troll, who decided to stop creating new handles here. I guess it was fatigueing to be continuouly banned, and having to create new handles. He is now on his 6th or 7th OH2 ban.. Samygupal was his handle, if I posted his earlier handles, you would remember them.