Business Insider Transportation Department says taxing drivers by the mile is not part of Biden's agenda after Buttigieg said it showed 'promise'

  • oeb11
  • 03-27-2021, 03:36 PM
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/mark...cLh?li=BBnbfcL


© John McDonnell/The Washington Post via Getty Images Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg at a press conference in February. John McDonnell/The Washington Post via Getty Images
  • The Department of Transportation clarified comments made Friday by Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg.
  • Buttigieg on Friday said that a mileage tax to fund Biden's infrastructure plan had "a lot of promise."
  • But on Saturday, a spokesperson said such a tax is not part of Biden's agenda.
  • See more stories on Insider's business page.
The office of Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg on Saturday said the Biden administration was not considering a plan to tax drivers by the number of miles that they drive after Buttigieg said during an interview he was open to the idea.

During a CNBC interview Friday about his goals for US infrastructure and Biden's upcoming infrastructure plan, Buttigieg was asked about funding the president's plan, which is expected to cost about $3 trillion. He was specifically questioned about the efficacy of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) tax, which would tax drivers by the number of miles they drive and is seen as an alternative to taxing gasoline.
"I think that shows a lot of promise," Buttigieg said. "If we believe in that so-called user-pays principle, the idea that part of how we pay for roads is you pay based on how much you drive. The gas tax used to be the obvious way to do it. It's not anymore, so a so-called vehicle miles traveled tax or mileage tax - whatever you want to call it - could be a way to do it."
"You're hearing a lot of 'maybe' here because all of these things need to be balanced and could be part of the mix," he said.
Read more: Apple will never deliver a car because it can't figure out how to work with the automakers who could make it happen
But a spokesperson for the Department of Transportation on Saturday shut down the idea after the statement went viral online in a short video clip, sparking a range of reactions and criticism online.
"The Secretary was having a broad conversation about a variety of ways to fund transportation," Ben Halle, a spokesperson for the Department of Transportation, told Insider's Adam Wren. "To be clear, he never said that VMT was under consideration by the White House as part of this infrastructure plan- and it is not."
Biden is expected to unveil his infrastructure plan in Pittsburgh next week. The $3 trillion proposal is expected to consist of two bills, according to a report from The New York Times. The first bill is expected to have a focus on upgrading bridges and roads while the second would focus on elements like education and childcare, according to the report.
Read the original article on Business Insider


Comment - One thing One can bet on and win every time - when the LSM marxist media denies a tax-raising DPST proposal is under consideration - One may be sure it will be enacted with all possible haste to augment DPST coffers.

and the DPST Congress will vote a big part of raising taxes into their own political coffers - requiring all citizens to pay for their enslavement to DPST marxism.



"Infrastructure' - is not bridges and roads - it is ensuring DPST hegemony to the Criminal fiden cabal.



They are fomenting Civil War in revolt against their Tyranny!
rexdutchman's Avatar
Pot hole pete , He couldn't even run his city he was mayor , just TAX TAX TAX the normal Dim_Wit response to all issues
Unique_Carpenter's Avatar
Rex,
Correct comment but,
You forgot to mention political doublespeak which Buttplug Pete is good at.
The "tax per mile" idea has been around before Teslas. Of course, Teslas don't pay gas taxes they pay utility taxes. The technical ability to tax per mile will be here soon if it isn't already.

There's going to be a lot of change. In about 10-20 years we won't need 3 gas stations at every intersection. Oil companies reserves will be marginalized. Slowly many vehicles will be obsolete. It will "really get bad" if we have self-driving car pools.

This doesn't have much to do with Biden or "The Green New Deal." This has more to do with technology evolution. The Progressive will try to incentivize and penalize but the markets are going to make the decision in the long run.
its designed to monitor you

and take away your personal freedoms that a personal vehicle affords

they want to tax you into oblivion in order to force the sheep onto crowded trains and buses
I do have a question about the Transportation Sec. How's come he and his gay partner are both called husbands? One has to be pitcher and other catcher. Are both gay partner females called wife's?
probably the biggest issue I have with dem policies are that they're always geared toward urban environments and have very little to do with rural areas or development outside of "no, no don't touch it!"
I do have a question about the Transportation Sec. How's come he and his gay partner are both called husbands? One has to be pitcher and other catcher. Are both gay partner females called wife's? Originally Posted by bill sins
old adjectives and pronouns are in the process of being outlawed
  • oeb11
  • 03-29-2021, 02:16 PM
use of 'outlawed ' words -

gets One sent immediately to AOC concentration camps for -re-education - and production of Soylent Green!
rexdutchman's Avatar
What ever the DPST idiots say the opposite is the TRUTH , your right that's the DOUBLESPECK.
Yupper FORCED compliance is coming
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
What ever the DPST idiots say the opposite is the TRUTH , your right that's the DOUBLESPECK.
Yupper FORCED compliance is coming Originally Posted by rexdutchman

yupper?



doublespeak. not doublespeck. lol. fix your spell checker!