I am a provider who requires a deposit for all visits and it's not a scam, but I can only speak for myself. I recommend you research the provider you are giving the deposit to. Do they have a social media presence? Do they seem coherent and responsive? Have you set a date and time to meet and are they requiring a deposit to hold that date? If the answer to those questions is yes, it is likely it is not a scam and yes, a deposit in the event you cancel. If the answer to those questions is mostly no, then it may be a scam.
This is a very contested issue currently as the landscape of provider/client relations is ever-evolving. Personally, I need my client to be held accountable in the event they decide to NC/NS me, so I take a deposit.
I have to put a credit card on file at my hair colorist, my hairstylist, my esthetician, and my nail tech before I make an appointment. If for some reason I can't make the appointment and don't give adequate notice, my card on file is charged either half of what the appointment cost would have been, or the entire amount depending on the service provider's policy. Why would it be different with your provider?
Originally Posted by Elle Banks
I'm not saying anyone I'd dishonest. The main problem with deposits is that it's free money for those who don't honor the agreement. This industry is riddled with well known providers and fly by night con artists who DO steal. It's the nature of it.
I get the comparison to other businesses requiring a credit card but that is not a good comparison to this industry.
In this no one should ever use any forms of payment that could be traced back to them. Right there, that negates personal credit cards. That leaves cash/checks/gift cards(that are not purchased with a credit card), etc. With these, the temptations are strong because it's goods in hand for no services. This is different from having a credit card on file with a business that will charge a NC/NS fee if someone goes MIA.
When it comes to clients reliability, the same can also be said for those who have a social media presence. I'm sure it's a much smaller group but could also be used to form a credible method of accountability. It's no guarantee of anything but it's better than absolutely nothing.
Bottom line, there is no right or wrong but each individual needs to know and understand the risks of putting out to much personal information and handing out unsecured funds for expected services based on the honor system.
I am almost certain if the roles were reversed, were clients were asking for and getting providers personal information/deposits, that would not go over well. It could also come with serious consequences for them.