Dr. Oz election results

VitaMan's Avatar
No outcome yet.



Can anyone figure out what Mr. Trump will say if Dr. Oz loses ?
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
No outcome yet.



Can anyone figure out what Mr. Trump will say if Dr. Oz loses ? Originally Posted by VitaMan

what are you going to say if Oz wins?
VitaMan's Avatar
What Mr. Trump says will be more important. He is a political figure of the Republican party. And also that is the topic of this thread.


I am just a poster on the political forum of a hooker board.

Perhaps you would like to say what you would say........Mr. SaySo.
What Mr. Trump says will be more important. He is a political figure of the Republican party. And also that is the topic of this thread.


I am just a poster on the political forum of a hooker board.

Perhaps you would like to say what you would say........Mr. SaySo. Originally Posted by VitaMan
He'll most likely say "We gave it our best shot". How's that.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
What Mr. Trump says will be more important. He is a political figure of the Republican party. And also that is the topic of this thread.


I am just a poster on the political forum of a hooker board.

Perhaps you would like to say what you would say........Mr. SaySo. Originally Posted by VitaMan

rather than crowing about the few races Trump backed candidates lost why don't ya list the full record and see what that is. you know what you'll find, that Trump's endorsement is largely effective for republican candidates.

while you are at it, why don't you start a thread on the influence of an endorsement from Biden, Clinton and Obama?

do you really think anyone wants Biden's endorsement?


bahahahahaaaaaaa
Precious_b's Avatar
What was his position (sayings) about him before election day?
texassapper's Avatar
doesn't matter... OZ would be another Romney. It's not really a win for America First...

Oz was pro red-flag law, pro gun control, pro trannie kids, pro abortion. He's just a commie in the Republican party. Its easy to understand this because if he was a real Conservative, all the Hollywood Libs would be dis-owning him.
doesn't matter... OZ would be another Romney. It's not really a win for America First...

Oz was pro red-flag law, pro gun control, pro trannie kids, pro abortion. He's just a commie in the Republican party. Its easy to understand this because if he was a real Conservative, all the Hollywood Libs would be dis-owning him. Originally Posted by texassapper
You're probably right. I never really liked the guy. I always had questioned his advice on Health matters. His knowledge on Diet like most Doctors is mediocre at best. If he loses so what, no big lose in my opinion.
Precious_b's Avatar
*I* really don't care what they say about him.

As with his other Oprah buddy, Dr Phil, I've been waiting for some dirt on Oz....which has already happened before he threw his hat in the political ring.
VitaMan's Avatar
Dr. Oz is a publicity seeking health scumbag, exactly like the evangelical preacher scumbags, the investment scumbags like Jim Cramer, and all the others. Maybe that is why Trump endorsed him.




Yssup Rider's Avatar
Trump immediately claimed the election was stolen.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Trump immediately claimed the election was stolen. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider



where's the link Aunt Peg?
Yssup Rider's Avatar
He'll most likely say "We gave it our best shot". How's that. Originally Posted by Levianon17
He started crying foul on election night.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
where's the link Aunt Peg? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
Here you go, Comerade Whackov (emeritus)

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/05/19/p...ies/index.html

Don’t try to deep throat it.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Here you go, Comerade Whackov (emeritus)

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/05/19/p...ies/index.html

Don’t try to deep throat it. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
you have more credibility than CNN because next to none is better than none right Aunt Peg?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies


Allegations of bias

See also: Media bias in the United States
CNN has often been the subject of allegations of party bias. The New York Times has described its development of a partisan lean during the tenure of Jeff Zucker. [1] In research conducted by the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard University and the Project for Excellence in Journalism, the authors found disparate treatment by CNN of Republican and Democratic candidates during the earliest five months of the presidential primaries in 2007: "The CNN programming studied tended to cast a negative light on Republican candidates—by a margin of three-to-one. Four-in-ten stories (41%) were clearly negative while just 14% were positive and 46% were neutral. The network provided negative coverage of all three main candidates with McCain fairing the worst (63% negative) and Romney fairing a little better than the others only because a majority of his coverage was neutral. It's not that Democrats, other than Obama, fared well on CNN either. Nearly half of the Illinois Senator's stories were positive (46%), vs. just 8% that were negative. But both Clinton and Edwards ended up with more negative than positive coverage overall. So while coverage for Democrats overall was a bit more positive than negative, that was almost all due to extremely favorable coverage for Obama."[2] In a New York Observer column entitled "Clinton News Network", political journalist Steve Kornacki criticized CNN's handling of the November 15, 2007, Democratic presidential debate, calling it biased towards Hillary Clinton.[3]


when the Kings of bias the NY Times call you biased ..


BAAHHHAAHHAAAAAA


CNN (Online News)

News Media





AllSides Media Bias Rating: Left (far left)


https://www.allsides.com/news-source/cnn-media-bias