Encounter: Nana of LA

Date: 6/9/2022
Name: Nana
Phone: After Screening
Email Address: Text Only
URL / Website: www.lovely-angel.net
City: DFW
State: Texas
Address: West of 35 / South of 635
Activities: Max Studio GFE: DFK, Shower Play, BBBJTCNQNS, Change Your Socks Lie Back Style with Jingle Bells, DATY, Breast Worship, MPFS
Hair Length and Color: Short just above shoulder, Black with dark brown highlights
Age: 30s
Smoking Status: I Couldn't Tell
Ethnic Background: Asian
Physical Description: ~5'1, ~95-100lbs nicely done MM Cs, soft tan skin, no tattoos or scars, overall a very attractive lady.
Recommendation: Yes

I've been a member here for a long time and I do my best to avoid drama here. That being said, I cannot in good conscience remain quiet when the mods decide to single out a specific entity and deny review credit for bogus reasons. It is well known that LA does not provide a phone number until you have satisfied their screening process. It is for this reason that visitors of LA are not to share or distribute their phone number, especially in reviews. It is also well known that the only way to reach LA prior to being screened is via their website: https://www.lovely-angel.net/contact and to my knowledge there is no known email address.
So in conclusion, my review contains the only postable contact information available. This is the same as previous reviews (which have been awarded review credit) and the same as any other (past or present) review of a visit to LA. For review credit not to be awarded all of a sudden is a clear act of prejudice against a specific entity by the mods of this board and highly disappointing. This goes against everything that this board's original intent was to be and serve going all the way back to the beginning and the previous days of ASPD. What a damn shame... SMH

I was denied recently for reviewing the same person more than once in 90 days. Also denied a different time for “nothing new” review.
The bias against lovely angels is just amazing. Multiple reviews of the same provider of any other agency is applauded by the mods.
Just sucks

I was denied recently for reviewing the same person more than once in 90 days. Also denied a different time for “nothing new” review.
The bias against lovely angels is just amazing. Multiple reviews of the same provider of any other agency is applauded by the mods.
Just sucks Originally Posted by Joebillybob

I can understand them not giving credit for multiple reviews by the same gent of the same provider within a 90 day period. In my case, this was the first time I had ever seen this provider. As for you being denied review credit with the reasoning of your review containing "nothing new", that definitely shows prejudice. Any time a popular provider gets reviewed a bunch they all start to read the same.

I3ear I3ear, which mod denied you credit for not supplying the phone number?

I3ear I3ear, which mod denied you credit for not supplying the phone number? Originally Posted by ntxguy

My review was denied credit by gman44.

I've looked all over for something recently posted by mods regarding this new denial of credit for "lack of contact info" prejudiced towards LA but I cant find anything.

It will suck to see future review get denied for PA just bc the number is private. We will probably see less reviews then there already are go up.

Nice review I3I3, good info on Nana and her departure. That's still a while to go so I got plenty of time to keep her busy. She's a ATF of mine.

I’m thinking about giving Nana the sauce……

I’m thinking about giving Nana the sauce…… Originally Posted by Silentbob2

Do it while she's still here, Nana gets my sauce all the time.

I have to agree. An email address and a website contact form will accomplish the exact same thing, not sure why it's a problem now.

P.S. Nana is phenomenal.

Do it while she's still here, Nana gets my sauce all the time. Originally Posted by City_Punk77

Dude, high five!! She loves the sauce!!

Dude, high five!! She loves the sauce!! Originally Posted by Silentbob2

*Gives silentbob2 a stellar high-five!

I’m thinking about giving Nana the sauce…… Originally Posted by Silentbob2

You don’t have to think about it, just do it.
Nana has one of the best spinner body’s out there.

Credit for this review has still not been given. Per this post https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2853334
from 2018 and refresh from 6/13/2022, this review meets all requirements. All members can access the posted URL as well as access the contact page which is the equivalent to an email address. The only thing on their website that requires a password is to view photos.
Gman44 has responded to me and states he is taking the issue to the "higher ups". Will be interesting to see how this is handled... I think the fair and unbiased resolution is beyond obvious at this point.

Isn't AS in the same boat with the website being the only available contact method until after screening? I wonder if AS reviews are getting credit. Just had my LA review denied for the same given reason, "no contact info" even though I listed the website.