he had white chunky stuff on it Originally Posted by FrEaKyKeEkIHere's a link so you can be better prepared next time..
Idk I saw a guy who was uncut and he had white chunky stuff on it and I just couldnt do it..I mean he left happy don't get me wrong but I just could do a BBBJ..Lol..I too am still fairly new to this but I just don't want to sound mean..lol. Originally Posted by FrEaKyKeEkIhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29882368...ome-std-risks/
. . . .Yep.... What DaMule said
And KeeKi, I'm assuming you don't have the Ladies Lounge access yet!?
I can assure you that no guy on here wanted to hear about another guys white chunky stuff....Originally Posted by DaMuLe888
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29882368/ns/health-sexual_health/t/male-circumcision-may-reduce-some-std-risks/ Originally Posted by acp5762
I think its a little extreme. Although the information is fact based, it's misleading by putting facts together to draw the reader into an uninformed bias.Alot of people would think it's extreme under normal circumstances. But a provider often sees a larger number of people than a non provider. Thats why I posted the link, that way she can make her own decision.
A few others but here is an Case example: 2,800 herpes cases of newborns, however, it doesn't state if the mate was circumcised or not.
The only thing that stands true with what it did disclose is that the chances of acquiring/transmitting an STD is decreased by circumcision. Originally Posted by DaMuLe888
Alot of people would think it's extreme under normal circumstances. But a provider often sees a larger number of people than a non provider. Thats why I posted the link, that way she can make her own decision. Originally Posted by acp5762True, but the study itself isn't from a viewpoint that is considered normal.