Encounter: Erin is superb

User ID: -
Date: 1/2/2023
Name: Erin Rose Taylor
Phone: -
Email Address: blondiejane@protonmail.com
URL (Profile or Bio Page): https://tryst.link/escort/erin-rose-taylor
City: Santa Fe
State: New Mexico
Address: My home north of the Plaza
Appointment Type: Outcall
Activities: FBSM GFE BBBJ RIM DATY FS
Duration of Encounter: Multi-hour
Hair Length and Color: Shoulder length dirty blond
Age: 35
Smoking Status: Non-Smoker
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: Tall, slender, elegant, natural Ds, great butt.
Recommendation: Yes

Bravo Kvothe. To the victor goes the spoils. You seem to have gained a new queen for the evening. This season that we expected to be for a happy Ho ho ho seems to have led may fellow mongers to a number of No no no's. You found what appears to be a queen of delight. She caught my eye and I anticipated a chance to introduce myself to her. A good strong localized review is always a plus. I guess by your name we should have expected a well written share.

Erin has only been in NM for about a year. She joins the handful of our best upper echelon providers. We should treat her well and make sure she feels welcome. We need more of her caliber.

https://www.eccie.net/member.php?u=3...=eccie_reviews

Unique. FYI. The link that you shared of her shows 1969 as a review date. She can't possibly be that old. Take a look.

Those last three reviews have corrupted data. The actual reviews date from 12/2016 to 02/2017 and look legitimate. There is probably a problem with the review header in the ECCIE database.

On some older reviews there's a rare bit of data corruption.
One of her's is a duplication, but has same thread ID. We can't fix with out taking out both.
Btw, whenever I post a gals eccie link, my point is that, in this example, Erin is a quite reputable provider.

Btw, whenever I post a gals eccie link, my point is that, in this example, Erin is a quite reputable provider. Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

In this case she is. But just because she is on ECCIE does not necessarily vouch for her reputation. It simply means that she is age verified and has not done anything against ECCIE guidelines bad enough to get her booted. LOL

I tried setting up a date with her instantly knew she was trouble. Why? She loves making you work just to get too her!! How ? Trying to make you go through a very intensive process for a screening and also asking for a deposit before meeting screw that. She ain't paying me Lol. I understand the screening process but the deposit part red flag. Oh also when you tell her "no im not interested anymore" she will flip out she has a little bit of an attitude problem gent's/gal's.

Erin is NOT trouble. She screens carefully (one of the marks of a good reliable provider) and asks for a deposit from new clients. Her prerogative. If you don't want to comply, move on. The attitude problem is clearly yours not hers. The trope on this board that requesting a deposit is automatically bad is just plain wrong. For STG providers, perhaps, for well reviewed and established ones, no.

I disagree. Sending a deposit is Always fraught with scam. I never do it. Neither should anyone else.

Seems like you found love within a provider, im happy too hear your experience was very exquisite and I'm flabbergasted your defensive as well as your partner Lol, fyi I'm just telling my experience about her a provider that is new too the area and obviously seems like a fraud in my book by demanding very odd requests to meet with her.... who knows maybe she isn't but I've never experienced a provider like her and her attitude.. anyways say no to deposits before meet up's protect your selfs at all cost's... stay safe gent's/ gal's

Kvothe has made 1 of only a *very*few*
(maybe 3?) reports that I have seen
of a deposit being paid that did not go south
That does not make it established acceptable protocol

We went many years without paying deposits
I do not feel inclined to start now
Dweezle is right. If you send a deposit & she welches,
what recourse do you have? None

I still have not had a provider that I consider to be “reputable”
request one. I would have to say that, if one did request a deposit,
it would cast doubt, in my mind, of her integrity

It is not clear who has the most attitude problem, here
Maybe plenty of attitude to go around

My take is that
the more deposits that get get paid, the more will be expected
I don’t agree that it’s a fair system. I don’t see the need
I do not intend to comply

Well said joyote

Agreed with joyote!!! kvothe seems like you kinda developed feelings for this one and or the overcharging traveling ones or something just opinion deposit is always a no no in my opinion.