Never drag queens..

Food for thought

Yeah. That suicide cult democrats want school kids to join is harmless. Teenagers taking hormone pills and chopping off healthy body parts is totally normal, no problem at all.

Yeah. That suicide cult democrats want school kids to join is harmless. Teenagers taking hormone pills and chopping off healthy body parts is totally normal, no problem at all. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

What about the god given right to be able to do whatever the heck you want to with your body?

It's never really about freedom, is it?

It's "freedom, as long as conforms to my whims and world view or religious beliefs" with most folks.

Hence the copious amount of othering that goes on and the endless need to have the converstions at the extremes rather than in the middle.

The drag queen's point was simple. The folks who complain most about grooming by "others" often look very much like the folks who keep getting caught actually grooming. But instead we're going to focus on the obvious "other"

There are legitimate counterpoints to that, so let's focus on what/where we agree.

Anyone who supports child medical transitioning is insane. I get the freedom argument but if you dog deeper into gender ideology, it's a blatant lie. So I don't think it's a freedom that one should argue for. It would be a different story if they weren't manipulating children with false promises.

Also yeah an adult can do whatever. But if we're going to have an age limit for a cigarette, beer and tattoo, we should limit experimental mutilation surgeries. Also chemical castration drugs. Also for the bizarre drag supporters, I don't think anything sexual should be performed in front of a child. Drag, gay, straight or cartoon.. only a creep would support that

People can do what they want, but pretending they’re sane and even promoting child mutilation makes you more fucked in the head than they are.

And none of that has a fucking thing at all to do with drag queens not falling into the prototypical groomer profile featured in TCAP.

What did you see that profile to be?

Would be nice to see you address that instead of more strawmen

I've never heard of drag queens doing anything more than being dramatic. Not violent, and often not gay, but as men, most don't even want to be women; they just want to dress up like them. They don't bother me, but I also don't agree that children need to be exposed to anything sexual at tender ages, including at book readings. Come dressed in a potato sack instead...it's about the book and making kids enjoy them. That said, teenage boys being read penthouse /hustler forum, by a skantilly clad model sounds like it would be exciting, but is equally inappropriate. Hyper sexuality just creates issues down the road, and can fuck up young impressionable minds. (But I like the idea of the later better than a drag queen.- but both are wrong)

And none of that has a fucking thing at all to do with drag queens not falling into the prototypical groomer profile featured in TCAP.

What did you see that profile to be?

Would be nice to see you address that instead of more strawmen Originally Posted by HDGristle

Because the premise is stupid. I haven’t seen a priest on that show either, but that doesn’t mean they don’t fiddle alter boys. The network would walk out of the house and not air the show if they did happen upon a tranny, so the point is moot anyways.

They had a Rabbi and a Minister, actually.

You can find whatever you want stupid, but you're interestingly pushing a similar profile there in your example as well.

Why are leftists so fond of Tranny's? They are always defending them here.

Are most Tranny's leftist and the left loves their own?

Or well you know. . .

In any case, if these people want to be freaks in the privacy of their own home, that's their right. But exposing youth to their perversions is simply wrong. And the whole mutilation of the genitals for someone who is not yet an adult should be criminal

And yet leftists support this crap.

Tranny's are not inheritability violent. The point of pushing that argument is not founded in truth. I don't think Dems think of then as pawns for that cause specifically,but as representative of any non violent cause that has opposition that is potentially violent. Gays, fems or any group castigated as less than others will rise up. That's human nature....so why the surprised reference to that?

It's interesting that after all this time some folks still don't understand the differences between drag and trans. And still try to smear others who do with inferences and broad stereotyping.

Ignorance and otherization go hand-in-hand.

Consistent attempts at dodging some hard truths by focusing on the other instead of being honest about just how many folks caught on that show and its successor resembled themselves at more than just a surface level.

Has anyone seen evidence of sexualized drag performances in front of children? I have. So when everyone kicks and screams to allow sexualized performances in front of children, I find it to be extremely disturbing. It seems like some of you want to desperately support drag for some reason. If that's the case, perhaps mention for audiences over 18. Then yeah I don't have a problem with that.