The Democrats Election Fraud in Wisconsin in 2020 Exposed

More and more have been in the news recently exposing the massive election fraud the Democrats committed in Wisconsin in 2020

Let's start here

Testimony from Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice and Special Counsel Gableman.

His investigation found that there were 7 million people registered to vote when only 4.5 million were eligible voters!

Gableman was directed by the Wisconsin Legislature to conduct a “minimal” investigation of the 2020 election, and he revealed numerous instances where he believed the law was broken, and had election officials referred for prosecution.

Gableman said it was “widely known” that Vos didn’t want a “deep” investigation, it was “not a serious effort.”

He said the Zuckerbucks contracts required the cities to follow instructions provided by CTCL, which he believed was a violation of law for a private entity to tell the government what to do.

Gableman was disturbed that the CTCL employees were able to determine if a voter was likely to vote for Trump or Biden by looking in the databases.

They were allowed to see voters who had requested ballots but hadn’t returned them, then go chase them down to get their ballots. He said the CTCL employees were “embedded” in the clerks’ offices and “running the elections.”

Gableman pointed out that Zuckerberg and his wife had publicly stated they wanted to defeat Trump. The pair hired progressive activist David Plouffe to run their operation. Plouffe had written a book on how to defeat Trump, where he said the election would be won dueling it out “block by block” in these types of big cities, Gableman said.

Gableman said votes were “illegally cast” that were deposited in drop boxes, since the drop boxes violated the law by not being placed near the clerks’ offices. Instead the clerks allowed the CTCL to dictate where they were placed. He said the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled they were illegal.

Lol

More bullshit from radical far-right conspiracy theory extremist news.

A simple 5 minute fact check dissolves much of the OP then just *flush* and let the rest swirl down and out of sight.

For anyone interested in reading a bit more about former Justice Gableman:

https://urbanmilwaukee.com/2023/03/0...ics-complaint/

The evidence continues much to the chagrin of the ill informed leftists who get triggered by their voter fraud being exposed

Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman says he found that nursing home workers were forging residents' signatures for absentee ballots and pressuring residents to cast ballots who had been adjudicated incompetent during the 2020 election.

Even more evidence

• Zuckbucks, with $8.8 million provided to Wisconsin's five large cities, violated the law:
• Zuckerberg's "employees" work for the clerk’s offices and get access to voter information that costs the public $12,500 but has a 4-5 day delay, so there is no way to verify activation.
• If clerks did not comply with Zuckerburg’s employees, there was a ‘penalty.’
• They had access and chased down ballots that were requested but not returned.
• Zuckerberg's employees essentially "ran the elections" while making statements against Trump.
• The WI Supreme Court confirmed ballot boxes were illegally placed, causing "illegally cast votes."
• The guy Zuckerburg hired to run the operation wrote a book on how to win the election in this manner.

... See? ... MORE Voting Fraud.

### Salty

A simple 5 minute fact check dissolves much of the OP then just *flush* and let the rest swirl down and out of sight.

For anyone interested in reading a bit more about former Justice Gableman:

https://urbanmilwaukee.com/2023/03/0...ics-complaint/ Originally Posted by DNinja69

All it takes is a simple 5 minute fact check to debunk almost everything the trump people have been saying about the 2020 election for 3 years now.

There was zero voter fraud in Wisconsin - CONFIRMED!

Most of those claims by the Trump camp about a stolen election got well more than a 5 minute fact check. Court after court heard the pleas and said no thanks. Trump was in charge of the Justice Dept at the time. He could have shared this so called 'proof' he was going to reveal a few weeks ago anytime but somehow only when confronted with possibly spending the rest of his life in prison (I don't think that is in his future...but) did he seem interested in presenting his case publicly.

I think if he had much at all it would have been featured in a format where millions could see it and Trump would have probably written a book about it. But instead we have more promises like the tax returns.

Not sure I agree there was zero voter fraud in any state but certainly there was not nearly enough to make any actual difference in the outcome.
The fallout that I most despise in this past decade of Obama and his birth certificate, Hillary / Trump with secure document issues, Hunter Biden, Bernie being undermined by the DNC, etc is the reality that there are now even more qualified candidates who are going to refuse any urging to run for President. I embrace legit efforts to investigate wrongdoing but this mentality that 'the other side' wants to seek impeachment from day 1 as a political ploy is just not going to end well for any of us.

Most of those claims by the Trump camp about a stolen election got well more than a 5 minute fact check. Court after court heard the pleas and said no thanks. Originally Posted by DNinja69

And yet another falsehood !!!

That is all the leftists have - how sad when it is so easily disproven

Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman discussed the investigation he did for the legislature on fraud in the 2020 Wisconsin election, and was asked about election official Meagan Wolfe's press release which declared that allegations of wrongdoing in the election had been refuted due to the courts. Gableman said that's not true, since the courts dismissed the election challenges citing the doctrine of laches, which means the allegations of wrongdoing were never addressed.

So first they had no standing to bring a case prior to the election and then when they did afterwards, it was dismissed on some BS doctrine of latches. No evidence was ever heard. The courts failed America

You not liking the outcomes does not invalidate their existence.

But there is hope as Trump has promised to provide (can't recall his exact words) irrefutable proof right? But of course on legal advice he is waiting. Let's hope the timetable doesn't mirror those pesky tax returns lol

Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Judge Michael Gableman testified election officials failed to have bipartisan observers present when collecting votes from nursing homes and just told clerks to break the law - Gableman notes there is video proof of officials admitting guilt.

Most of those claims by the Trump camp about a stolen election got well more than a 5 minute fact check. Court after court heard the pleas and said no thanks. Trump was in charge of the Justice Dept at the time. He could have shared this so called 'proof' he was going to reveal a few weeks ago anytime but somehow only when confronted with possibly spending the rest of his life in prison (I don't think that is in his future...but) did he seem interested in presenting his case publicly.

I think if he had much at all it would have been featured in a format where millions could see it and Trump would have probably written a book about it. Originally Posted by DNinja69

This all goes to show how little the trump camp actually has on the shelf. They were given every opportunity to have their day in court, present this "evidence" they keep blabbering about and make their case. They have nothing. Nearly 3 years later, nothing. He was supposed to present "irrefutable evidence" a few weeks ago. Nothing.

No evidence. Only tears and crackpot conspiracy theories for which lower level trump scum keep going to jail for. Lol. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so pathetic.

I believe Mr 45 was supposed to have a giant meeting a few Mondays back, and would completely exonerate him and provide proof of these voter fraud issues he was touting.

Although it didn't happen it probably would have lived up to the same hype of Rudy's "Four Season's fun fact folly."

If there are so many things 'proven' of these illegalities, why are they not vetted and adjudicated in a court of law?

If there are so many things 'proven' of these illegalities, why are they not vetted and adjudicated in a court of law? Originally Posted by eyecu2

Already answered - you should play closer attention

Gableman said that's not true, since the courts dismissed the election challenges citing the doctrine of laches, which means the allegations of wrongdoing were never addressed.

So first they had no standing to bring a case prior to the election and then when they did afterwards, it was dismissed on some BS doctrine of latches. No evidence was ever heard. The courts failed America