... And wouldja lookie there - ABC-News, CNN, Fox-News and others
are all reporting that - YES - Bill Clinton WAS there. Many times.
... Just NOT as Bill Clinton. ... But as "Doe-36" or whatever it was.
... Now we're all well-aware of Trump being there... Interested in
perchasing the property even BEFORE it was Epstein Island.
.. Though it surely seems quite odd, though... WHY a fellow
such-as Bill Clinton would need to use a FAKE name, and seek to
HIDE his trips there.
... Maybe one o' you fellows can supply a good answer to that??
#### Salty
Originally Posted by Salty Again
Why would
any President, current or former, have anything to do with visiting Epstein's Playground?
Why are you making a big stink about Clinton visiting there? Man is in his twilight years and doesn't seem to be on course to kill our country. If he went there, he should be charged if he played in the playground.
So should
literally everyone else who visited, but for the sake of not naming names for 'off topic', why do you only care about Clinton?
Every man and woman who visited that island and did abhorrent things should be charged, and locked up, or should end up joining Epstein.
Do you disagree with this? The next question is, in which order should we charge them? In my opinion, we should go after whoever is in the race to receive 'immunity' or whatever they think the Presidential office will provide them, because the POTUS isn't above the law. Only then should we go after the old perverts who are in their twilight years.
Save the towers by going after the hijacker pilots first, not by shooting down the plane, or demolishing the towers, to say it another way