Tyson Foods Fires Hard-Working American Employees and Instead Hires Illegal Immigrants

The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
we told ya this was the plan all along

and now it's happening

open borders is an invasion of America brought to you by the DNC and Biden

who still supports Biden now?


Tyson Foods Fires Hard-Working American Employees and Instead Hires Illegal Immigrants

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraha...oyees-n2636564


Welcome to 2024, where it is more beneficial to be an illegal immigrant in the United States than a U.S.-born, hard-working, law-abiding citizen.
Tyson Foods is facing criticism and calls to be boycotted over the company reportedly firing its employees and hiring illegal immigrants in their place.


According to Bloomberg, just days after Tyson Foods’s Perry, Iowa location fired more than 1,200 American workers, the company announced that it has partnered with a non-profit refugee group, Tent Partnership for Refugees, hiring thousands of asylum seekers instead.


The food company reportedly recently had a job fair in Iowa for immigrants to attend as American workers remain without paychecks. Tyson Foods also created a database of tens of thousands of illegal alien workers that they plan to replace American workers with, offering $16.50-an-hour wages and free immigration lawyers.


Tyson recently hired tens of dozens of illegal immigrants from Venezuela, Mexico, and Colombia during a job fair in New York City.


“It is ILLEGAL under federal law to discriminate against American citizens based on their citizenship in favor of non-citizens of any kind when it comes to employment,” America First Legal said, adding that Tyson is breaking the law by favoring illegal immigrant workers over Americans.


The outlet also noted that the company has not only set millions of dollars aside for the immigrant’s legal fees, but will also provide housing, on-site child care, transportation, and paid time off to attend court hearings.


Tyson’s CEO Donnie King, who makes up to $13 million a year, has funded the campaigns of President Joe Biden, Nikki Haley, and others, according to Open Secrets.


The company already has about 42,000 immigrants working for them among its 120,000 U.S. workforce.


“We would like to employ another 42,000 if we could find them,” Tyson employee Garrett Dolan, told the outlet. The majority of new hires “Are going to come from refugees and immigrants, so we're now in the business of strategically thinking that through.”


In 2022, the company hired 2,500 refugees under the Tent program.


bambino's Avatar
Arkansas is corrupt as fuck. From Walmart, Clintons all the way down.
HDGristle's Avatar
Is an asylee with a valid EAD legally authorized to work?

Is a refugee with a valid EAD legally authorized to work?

Will laid off workers be given consideration for roles in Tyson's other Iowa facilities?

Is it inherently illegal to shutter a plant in one state and move work to other facilities including a new facility in another state?

If we ignore how the DOL actually operates, what is the implication of 60k openings nationwide, where 42k roles will likely be filled by legally authorized foreign nationals? Does that leave 18k openings?

Do you know how an I-9 works? Or E-Verify?

What is the definition of a U.S. worker? Are you familiar with the INA? Or 8 USC 1101?

How about 8 USC 1160(a), 8 USC 1161(a), 8 USC 1255(a)(1), 8 USC 1157 and 8 USC 1158?
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Is an asylee with a valid EAD legally authorized to work?

Is a refugee with a valid EAD legally authorized to work?

Will laid off workers be given consideration for roles in Tyson's other Iowa facilities?

Is it inherently illegal to shutter a plant in one state and move work to other facilities including a new facility in another state?

If we ignore how the DOL actually operates, what is the implication of 60k openings nationwide, where 42k roles will likely be filled by legally authorized foreign nationals? Does that leave 18k openings?

Do you know how an I-9 works? Or E-Verify?

What is the definition of a U.S. worker? Are you familiar with the INA? Or 8 USC 1101?

How about 8 USC 1160(a), 8 USC 1161(a), 8 USC 1255(a)(1), 8 USC 1157 and 8 USC 1158? Originally Posted by HDGristle

60/70 percent do not make asylum requirements


care to refute that? or disprove it?
HDGristle's Avatar
It's actually about 80% as of Feb 2024.

Have you ever looked at the case stats? If so, are adjudicated denials the primary cause for the rate to be so high or are there other reasons?
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
It's actually about 80% as of Feb 2024.

Have you ever looked at the case stats? If so, are adjudicated denials the primary cause for the rate to be so high or are there other reasons? Originally Posted by HDGristle



exactly. i was being "conservative" but it proves the point, yes?
HDGristle's Avatar
No. You were just using old data

I get you want to focus on the rate, but do you know what drives it?

I also note you're avoiding the questions posed. And trying to have a narrow focus on asylum seekers who aren't granted asylum.

I also know why.
Lol. Ahh yes, another Republican "boycott".

I'm guessing this one won't last long either. Setting the over/under at 2 weeks and taking the under.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
No. You were just using old data

I get you want to focus on the rate, but do you know what drives it?

I also note you're avoiding the questions posed. And trying to have a narrow focus on asylum seekers who aren't granted asylum.

I also know why. Originally Posted by HDGristle

how old is that data?


Lol. Ahh yes, another Republican "boycott".

I'm guessing this one won't last long either. Setting the over/under at 2 weeks and taking the under. Originally Posted by tommy156



if you say so
HDGristle's Avatar
3 years. Enough to see some very interesting changes.

It will be interesting to see if you try to connect the dots.

If you do, you'll be able to tell me why 14% is important and what the denial rate actually is. There's a very important column in the court data that isn't approvals or denials.

There's also this whole thing about a legal process, the I-765 and the I-551 that connects back to some of the earlier questions you're dodging as you're pushing a narrative about "illegals" while ignoring any of the relevant facts concerning the Perry plant.
bambino's Avatar