i am not really upset but i do find it funny that the review i posted about almost getting robbed dose not count because " no activities happened".
so if i did get robbed it would be ok?
i think reviews warning of scams, danger to person, or getting robbed should be the most important kind of reviews. by not giving access to them will just discourage people from posting them.
please let me know if you all think i am wrong in my thinking
- haziem
- Yesterday, 09:45 AM
- HDGristle
- Yesterday, 10:38 AM
You're conflating credit for a review with a warning about a cash and dash. You didn't get services, so you have nothing to review. Thus no PA credit. Instead you shared a valuable public service announcement about someone we should avoid but several folks will probably be 10x more likely to see now for various reasons.
You don't get PA credit, but I award you 3 virtual bro tokens and my thanks.
This happens multiple times a year and staff's policy hasn't changed in years. So even though you think there's a disincentive, we have the same convo without PA
You don't get PA credit, but I award you 3 virtual bro tokens and my thanks.
This happens multiple times a year and staff's policy hasn't changed in years. So even though you think there's a disincentive, we have the same convo without PA