Sources for news and posting their links

Gateway pundit, telegram and Twitterx are not reliable/credible news sources for politics. Why do some think they are?
They're propaganda outlets at best.
So why post their political stories and links.
They're on par with national enquirer.

Here's a recent list of lies from the media that you like:

- Russia collusion
- Hunter Biden laptop
- Charlottesville
- Bubba Wallace
- Jussie Smollett
- Covington Catholic students
- Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot
- COVID lab leak was a “conspiracy theory”
- Steele dossier
- Don’t Say Gay was in the bill
- Migrant “kids In cages”
- GA election integrity was the new “Jim crow”
- Duke lacrosse kids
- Jan 6 video footage
- “Peaceful” BLM riots
- Ivermectin is a horse dewormer
- Trump used teargas to clear a crowd for a bible photo
- The list goes on…

Yet you continue consuming this garbage. You’re living in the matrix and you don’t even know it.

Why does anyone think gateway Tele and Twitty are credible? They are pure propaganda outlets

Why does anyone thing ABC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, and New York Times are credible news sources when they have been proven liars?

Here's a recent list of lies from the media that you like:

- Russia collusion
- Hunter Biden laptop
- Charlottesville
- Bubba Wallace
- Jussie Smollett
- Covington Catholic students
- Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot
- COVID lab leak was a “conspiracy theory”
- Steele dossier
- Don’t Say Gay was in the bill
- Migrant “kids In cages”
- GA election integrity was the new “Jim crow”
- Duke lacrosse kids
- Jan 6 video footage
- “Peaceful” BLM riots
- Ivermectin is a horse dewormer
- Trump used teargas to clear a crowd for a bible photo
- The list goes on…

Yet you continue consuming this garbage. You’re living in the matrix and you don’t even know it. Originally Posted by HoHound

... Blimey! ... I don't reckon that Gateway Pundit
started ANY of those news storys.

#### Salty

OP - Please explain to the masses assembled here in the Political Forum how your post belongs in this forum.

OP - Please explain to the masses assembled here in the Political Forum how your post belongs in this forum. Originally Posted by biomed1

Title and post speaks for itself.
Move it or close it or leave it.
I'm OK with it.

If this is in fact a forum for debate, then there should be some ground rules. A major part of proof is credible citation for one’s contentions.

Education level notwithstanding, using a one liner or YouTube from X or any other social media source is merely the promotion of frivolous and often malicious gossip.

My interpretation of the OP is just that.

Without a level playing field, these threads are destined to go off track.

If you believe the back of a matchbook is truth and proof then don’t be outraged and butthurt when those who do the research call bullshit.

Make sense?

I only believe the news if it’s approved by 51 current and former intelligence officials.

LOLLING? (Figures)

Why does anyone thing ABC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, and New York Times are credible news sources when they have been proven liars? Originally Posted by farmstud60

News agencies don’t always get it right but they do their best to provide facts when reporting. And when they get it wrong it’s usually followed up with better reporting and a retraction of the incorrect information.

That’s what makes them relevant and reliable news sources.

If this is in fact a forum for debate, then there should be some ground rules. A major part of proof is credible citation for one’s contentions.

Education level notwithstanding, using a one liner or YouTube from X or any other social media source is merely the promotion of frivolous and often malicious gossip.

My interpretation of the OP is just that.

Without a level playing field, these threads are destined to go off track.

If you believe the back of a matchbook is truth and proof then don’t be outraged and butthurt when those who do the research call bullshit.

Make sense? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

News agencies don’t always get it right but they do their best to provide facts when reporting. And when they get it wrong it’s usually followed up with better reporting and a retraction of the incorrect information.

That’s what makes them relevant and reliable news sources. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Great posts

News agencies don’t always get it right but they do their best to provide facts when reporting. And when they get it wrong it’s usually followed up with better reporting and a retraction of the incorrect information.

That’s what makes them relevant and reliable news sources. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

+1

I agree with you. However, not sure if Fox News ever does a retraction.

News agencies don’t always get it right but they do their best to provide facts when reporting. And when they get it wrong it’s usually followed up with better reporting and a retraction of the incorrect information.

That’s what makes them relevant and reliable news sources. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

That is complete bullshit. The only time they get it right is if it benefits their narrative. If it doesn't support what they want to push they ignore it or in many cases make shit. They may eventually issue a correction but only after the damage has been done and it no longer matters to the outcome they are in favor of. Prior to Elon buying twitter you lefties were all about using it as a source of info but now that it is an open forum it somehow becomes unreliable. The main stream media has a long way to go to regain their credibility after all the lies and bullshit they spouted during the last 2 elections.

When I see a political post supported by certain link sources i already know its opinionated propaganda. Because these sources hold zero accountability.