Oprah got paid by Kamala ? Not so fast

Several social media posts by GOP members claim Oprah got paid off for endorsing Kamala. Here she defends herself.

And it cost a million dollars? I don't doubt she supported kamala but saying she did't take any money is bullshit. Her company made money so in turn she made money.

And it cost a million dollars? I don't doubt she supported kamala but saying she did't take any money is bullshit. Her company made money so in turn she made money. Originally Posted by Budman

More insight into the cost of TV production in 2024. Thanks, budman! That clears it up.


HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAH!

TV shows don’t charge their guests for “production costs”. They’re invited into a studio that belongs to the show. Oprah is trying to save face hoping you won’t know this, and it’s working. The how to suck dick girl also got six figures in “production costs”, which consisted of a cheap desk and a hotel room. I think the twerking rapper girl got 5 mil for dancing around like a retard for a few minutes. Who knew one could get so rich by being untalented with a fat ass.

TV shows don’t charge their guests for “production costs”. They’re invited into a studio that belongs to the show. Oprah is trying to save face hoping you won’t know this, and it’s working. The how to suck dick girl also got six figures in “production costs”, which consisted of a cheap desk and a hotel room. I think the twerking rapper girl got 5 mil for dancing around like a retard for a few minutes. Who knew one could get so rich by being untalented with a fat ass. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Don’t forget Beyonce’
Can you imagine wasting all of that money for a rally appearance in Texas.

It probably cost Harris votes.

And this is important to you because...

Do you have any evidence from a credible news source who the how to suck dick girl is?

Need those sources, editors!

Btw - was it a TV show that charged her for the production? Is that how TV shows operate? You know this for a fact because ...l

And it cost a million dollars? Her company made money so in turn she made money. Originally Posted by Budman

The production could have been done at COST and not for profit. Only the accountants for HARPO productions who would have access to the Ledger system would know.

Your opinion is just speculation. Unless you can see the accounting, you would not know whether the show was done at cost or for profit.

At least the accountants for Harpo Productions make truthful accounting entries. They did not try to hide anything like Trump did with the Stormy Daniels hush money.

The production could have been done at COST and not for profit. Only the accountants for HARPO productions who would have access to the Ledger system would know.

Your opinion is just speculation. Unless you can see the accounting, you would not know whether the show was done at cost or for profit.

At least the accountants for Harpo Productions make truthful accounting entries. They did not try to hide anything like Trump did with the Stormy Daniels hush money. Originally Posted by adav8s28

Oprah owns Harpo Productions. Oprah net worth 3 Billion. So if your really dedicated to The Harris cause, she couldn’t afford to “foot the bill” for the production. Oprah just came to the trough to eat like the rest of Kamala’s celebrities

Oprah owns Harpo Productions. Oprah net worth 3 Billion. So if your really dedicated to The Harris cause, she couldn’t afford to “foot the bill” for the production. Oprah just came to the trough to eat like the rest of Kamala’s celebrities
Originally Posted by tman1847

There is a big difference between "At Cost" and "For Profit". If Tesla only sold all of their electric cars "At Cost" Elon Musk would not be the worlds richest person. Doing something at cost is partly charitable.

You have Oprah confused with a guy like Rev Al Sharpton the civil rights activist and part time talking head at MSNBC. Sharpton as you put it "Came to eat". His interview with Harris was done solely for Profit. His organization pocketed some $500,000. This is an example of how the Harris/Waltz campaign fund almost ran out of money, after raising a Billion dollars .

There is a big difference between "At Cost" and "For Profit". If Tesla only sold all of their electric cars "At Cost" Elon Musk would not be the worlds richest person. Doing something at cost is partly charitable.

You have Oprah confused with a guy like Rev Al Sharpton the civil rights activist and part time talking head at MSNBC. Sharpton as you put it "Came to eat". His interview with Harris was done solely for Profit. His organization pocketed some $500,000. This is an example of how the Harris/Waltz campaign fund almost ran out of money, after raising a Billion dollars . Originally Posted by adav8s28

So you know that Oprah did the interview "At Cost" Could you provide a link to this information. This is what was widely published.


Citing the Washington Examiner, Harris campaign spent 15 Million on “event production” with One Million allocated to Winfrey’s Harpo productions
The Harris campaign paid Oprah $1 million to do that interview, and she spent $100,000 building the set of the Call Her Daddy podcast so Kamala Harris wouldn’t have to fly out to LA to film it.
"Oprah had to basically guide her through puff ball questions and she still had no answers"
Almost everyone knows Sharpton is a crook, apparently Oprah is not much different.
Assuming you are not worth 3 Billion like Oprah, did you request Harris pay for your time posting to defend her

There is a big difference between "At Cost" and "For Profit". Originally Posted by adav8s28

Like what? 10%?

Assuming you are not worth 3 Billion like Oprah, did you request Harris pay for your time posting to defend her? Originally Posted by tman1847

Adav8's fee is the same for all his clients - 50 cents an hour!

Oprah is not a crook.

Oprah is not a crook. Originally Posted by VitaMan

I don't believe I called Oprah a crook. I stated she is much like Sharpton. In the fact that she uses her race, wealth and celebrity status to direct people to vote for a totally unqualified candidate.
All you hear the dems state is how she only had 100 days to campaign. She had almost 4 years to prove she was capable of being the president of this country. Did Oprah or Sharpton publicize all of her successes. Being black and a woman isn't a success. She had nothing to show for her time as VP

Oprah at least has some real talent and is likable. Sharpton is a race huckster and Kamala is a diversity hire.

Citing the Washington Examiner, Harris campaign spent 15 Million on “event production” with One Million allocated to Winfrey’s Harpo productions
The Harris campaign paid Oprah $1 million to do that interview, and she spent $100,000 building the set of the Call Her Daddy podcast so Kamala Harris wouldn’t have to fly out to LA to film it. Originally Posted by tman1847

Did the Wasington Examiner post the accounting cost for Harpo Productions to produce the "Event Production"? Oprah said she didn't make any money off the interview (the implication is it was done at cost). Only the accountants at Harpo Productions would know for sure (unless accounting is done by a vendor like Price Waterhouse).

Why is it that when someone takes the side of the left, the perception is they are being paid? When someone takes the side of the right, it's being done for free.