Before the Ban

Yes I am Shinepro. The fucking legend. We are having the annual food stamp cook off and guess what. The only white boy im inviting is pxo. Pxmcc. Stand up white boy. Let me tell you clowns something. I don’t care about no bitch. I fuck with a family of soldiers. Everyone has their place. I live in a high rise. When my OG comes in my room and wakes me up I rise up and say yes Sir. He says go to valet and pull the car up. This is at like 5 in the morning and I got a bitch tucked. Fuck you bitch, I run downstairs and pull that Maybach up. Open the door for that dude. He looked me in my eyes, and this is one of the richest dudes in Houston, he said I love you. Meant the world because it’s based off loyalty. He knows I’ll never choose some bullshit pussy or a nut over my family. We roll through every club 20 deep. Everyone strapped. I did 10 calendar years pen time. I got commissary from my OG the whole time because I didn’t snitch. Came out. OG car waiting . He said you ready. I said yes Sir and to the high rise we go. I’m back to my job of taking care of my crew and my OG. Pxo you are street certified. We are in all clubs with sections getting fucked up.


[staff edit - content edit - DM]

I appreciate the fact he just got banned. Just curious, when a person makes trolling posts, especially multiple trolling posts, then they get banned, why are the trolling posts still left up, especially with disparaging remarks made about members here.


Since we're here, I also have an issue with fake trolling reviews, that are later in the thread proven to be a BS review, why is that review left to stand and be here forever? I think that a thread that leads off with a fake review, when proven wrong, just be removed and when looking at the providers sum page, the same review with a NO should also be removed. Why should a BS NO review be allowed to follow her around forever? Rules or not, IMHO, this is inherently wrong. If a provider deserves a NO, then it is what it is, however when she got a NO that was proven to be a fake review, therefore a fake NO, it shouldn't follow her around forever.

[staff edit - content edit - DM] Originally Posted by IhaveaBBC

Nothing against Slayer, however the fact that he made Cendall famous is an out and out BS lie. BB kid is one of my best buddies, and when he vouches for Cendall, (which he has in a big way) his vouch is pure and 100% fucking gold. Same for RM, who was a Wildflower at one time which means she was vouched for by the lovely Beth, if she worked for Beth, she was also gold. If a lady worked for Beth, you can bet she took care of her men and to this day I miss Beth so much, however in the RW we're Facebook friends so we touch base on occasion.

D_J, i think its you post it, you own it kind of deal.

well, that was fast..

mods, let him come back as shinepro in a few months. all these handles are jus doing too much. it's like a game of whack-a-mole..

anyway, that's my 2 cents, if it's worth even that..

D_J, they have a fake review procedure. basically, they put the hobbyist on blast. gotta be pretty humiliating lol.

Well that didn't take long.
Which of his other handles is next?

What's going on with this guy? That's alot to digest. Geez dude please lay off the bottle or go to bed. I'm black but please someone explain to me what an OG is? Who is RM and who is Gina? Who is Pxo?

Well that didn't take long.
Which of his other handles is next? Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

loveapawg

Hi beloved.
I feel so strongly the same way. It discourages new members from joining/staying and It's also the reason why I (and a few of my friends are not very active here) aside from the consistent banned accounts being restored and the rejected incels harassing in the comment section of a positive review,it still stays up on our page under our encounter reports....doesn't really effect us seasoned/established companions but it could effect business for newer companions who are just getting started. I will say this... It is a great screening resource for us companions...one of my friends slipped up and saw one of the incels who harassed me due to rejection and I filled her and he's dead to her. Fact is that some companions won't use this VALUABLE screening resource because of the trolls deter them away and that sucks. I mostly just log in to research handles who ask for visit and look at their posting history, see if we're compatible, check dms and log out. I don't like the idea of interacting with incels and banned accounts. You're bound to lose brain cells...The mods and admins do their best but there's only so much they can do. They still have to maintain the sites rules afterall. I wish changes would be made. It's a great screening resource

I appreciate the fact he just got banned. Just curious, when a person makes trolling posts, especially multiple trolling posts, then they get banned, why are the trolling posts still left up, especially with disparaging remarks made about members here.


Since we're here, I also have an issue with fake trolling reviews, that are later in the thread proven to be a BS review, why is that review left to stand and be here forever? I think that a thread that leads off with a fake review, when proven wrong, just be removed and when looking at the providers sum page, the same review with a NO should also be removed. Why should a BS NO review be allowed to follow her around forever? Rules or not, IMHO, this is inherently wrong. If a provider deserves a NO, then it is what it is, however when she got a NO that was proven to be a fake review, therefore a fake NO, it shouldn't follow her around forever Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

What's going on with this guy? That's alot to digest. Geez dude please lay off the bottle or go to bed. I'm black but please someone explain to me what an OG is? Who is RM and who is Gina? Who is Pxo? Originally Posted by Loveapawg

Gina is royalty. Px is a good guy.
Guidelines I agree to and believe in whenever signing in prevent me on anymore comments .
To bad ibbc is already banned

D_J, i think its you post it, you own it kind of deal Originally Posted by pxmcc

OfCourse they post it and own it, they don't care because their accounts get banned then unbanned while their comments stays up. Imagine a brand new companion trying to establish herself and mark her name then an angry rejected incel pukes in the comment section of her good reviews...Seasoned hobbyists can spot the trolls and angry rejects but not newer hobbyists.

#Foook
#ModTies
Is the cook-off still happening??
#Franks&Beans
#FreeTati
#ResPekk
#DaHobby

ToodleZ... Old man...

Toodlez….

^^^We think alike lol

I appreciate the fact he just got banned. Just curious, when a person makes trolling posts, especially multiple trolling posts, then they get banned, why are the trolling posts still left up, especially with disparaging remarks made about members here.


Since we're here, I also have an issue with fake trolling reviews, that are later in the thread proven to be a BS review, why is that review left to stand and be here forever? I think that a thread that leads off with a fake review, when proven wrong, just be removed and when looking at the providers sum page, the same review with a NO should also be removed. Why should a BS NO review be allowed to follow her around forever? Rules or not, IMHO, this is inherently wrong. If a provider deserves a NO, then it is what it is, however when she got a NO that was proven to be a fake review, therefore a fake NO, it shouldn't follow her around forever.





Nothing against Slayer, however the fact that he made Cendall famous is an out and out BS lie. BB kid is one of my best buddies, and when he vouches for Cendall, (which he has in a big way) his vouch is pure and 100% fucking gold. Same for RM, who was a Wildflower at one time which means she was vouched for by the lovely Beth, if she worked for Beth, she was also gold. If a lady worked for Beth, you can bet she took care of her men and to this day I miss Beth so much, however in the RW we're Facebook friends so we touch base on occasion. Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

DJ - Interesting comments. I think that the Mods/powers that be can simply add a large, bold banner....

For a Review - The banner would say something like "NOTE - THIS HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE FAKE REVIEW. You could add something like "TAKE WITH A GRAIN OF SALT".

For these ridiculous threads in Coed when someone is banned - The BANNER would say something like "NOTE - THIS POSTER HAD BEEN IDENTIFIED TO HAVE MULTIPLE HANDLES AND HAS BEEN BANNED". IF THE PERSON IS A TRUE/KNOWN TROUBLE MAKER IT COULD SAY SOMETHING ABOUT THAT.

I know that it is clear that the Op for this thread has been BANNED as it says under his name... I'm just saying to post a BANNER within the thread... perhaps right at the bottom of the opening post... or under the first post the guy makes in the thread would be beneficial...

If the policy is to keep the Review or Thread... consider using a BANNER/WARNING SIGN to make it clear what's going on...

A'Man

ps - We all know there are other active handles/accounts by the same guy... why is that account(s) not also banned?

Hi beloved
Even when the mods flag a review as fake...it still stays up under her encounter reports, instead of being deleted and that's an issue because that's what the stalkers want. There's a lot of sickos out there that a lot of you are unaware of. They're getting off to the idea of them being forever connected/associated with a companion as it stays up on the companion's page.

DJ - Interesting comments. I think that the Mods/powers that be can simply add a large, bold banner....

For a Review - The banner would say something like "NOTE - THIS HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE FAKE REVIEW. You could add something like "TAKE WITH A GRAIN OF SALT".

For these ridiculous threads in Coed when someone is banned - The BANNER would say something like "NOTE - THIS POSTER HAD BEEN IDENTIFIED TO HAVE MULTIPLE HANDLES AND HAS BEEN BANNED". IF THE PERSON IS A TRUE/KNOWN TROUBLE MAKER IT COULD SAY SOMETHING ABOUT THAT.

I know that it is clear that the Op for this thread has been BANNED as it says under his name... I'm just saying to post a BANNER within the thread... perhaps right at the bottom of the opening post... or under the first post the guy makes in the thread would be beneficial...

If the policy is to keep the Review or Thread... consider using a BANNER/WARNING SIGN to make it clear what's going on...

A'Man

ps - We all know there are other active handles/accounts by the same guy... why is that account(s) not also banned? Originally Posted by anandaman

Well that didn't take long.
Which of his other handles is next? Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

Maybe Pitroom, Trillburgers, Fuckcenterpoint, Foxtrot Dancer, TrumpSwifty Fan, Hakuna Matata, Cooking Cajun, 007 Octopussy, Scrooge McDuck, Chiefs3pete, Huskylover, BlueManGroup89? I probably missed a few...