CEO of Crowds on Demand AKA rent a mob offered $20 million to organize demonstrations around the country.

https://crowdsondemand.com/blog/fill...xt-event-6jn7p

CEO of Activist Group Reveals He Was Offered $20 Million to Provide Demonstrators for Anti-Trump Rallies

If you've ever wondered how the left manages to get people to show up at its protests, hold shiny, pre-printed signs, and scream out in supposed rage against all the things, but especially Donald Trump, we may have the answer for you: rent-a-crowd. It's just like Rent-a-Center, where you can, for a price, get all the items you need to temporarily furnish your home or office, but it instead involves people willing to show up, again at a price, to protest The Current Outrage.

Adam Swart, CEO of an activist group called Crowds on Demand, revealed in an interview on Tuesday that his organization, which helps provide bodies at protests and demonstrations, had been contacted by "interests aligned" with the upcoming "Good Trouble Lives On" protests to help out. According to Swart, he was offered a cool $20 million by these unnamed individuals or organizations to "organize huge demonstrations around the country."

What Are These People Thinking? Anti-BBB Protestors Occupy Capitol.

What exactly is "Good Trouble Lives On," you ask? Good question. The short answer is that it's the latest iteration of No Kings, the Women's March or any number of radical leftist protests that target President Trump and often end in violence. Think "fiery, but mostly peaceful." The longer answer is that there exists a web of dark money that funds these demonstrations, and all roads typically lead back to the Tides Foundation and George Soros.

"Good Trouble Lives On" takes its name from the late Rep. John Lewis (D-GA), who apparently coined the term "good trouble" as "the action of coming together to take peaceful, non-violent action to challenge injustice and create meaningful change." Here's what the group of very murky origins says they stand for:

A core principle behind all Good Trouble Lives On events is a commitment to nonviolent action. We expect all participants to seek to de-escalate any potential confrontation with those who disagree with our values and to act lawfully at these events. Weapons of any kind, including those legally permitted, should not be brought to events.

What they are protesting is anybody's guess. You have to show up to find out, I suppose. I'm putting my money on abortion, immigration raids, law enforcement, DOGE, and, of course, Donald Trump. Maybe with a little bit of gun control and Tesla smattered in for effect.

The group is planning nationwide protests on July 17, and that's where Crowds on Demand comes in. If Mr. Swart is to be believed, and there's no reason not to, hard-left organizers are busy trying to get warm bodies on the ground in order to swell the numbers at these events.


Crowds on Demand describes itself as "your home for impactful advocacy campaigns, demonstrations, PR stunts, crowds for hire and corporate events." Swart told NewsNation's Brian Entin Tuesday that his firm has "large network of people from every political perspective," and the people he works with are passionate about the campaigns and events. Swart also said the protestors can be paid "hundreds of dollars a day" for their time.

Could this guy just be spinning tales in order to get his name and brand out there? Sure. But, many Americans have wondered about the crowds, made up of folks seemingly with copious amounts of free time, that seem to pop up out of nowhere and just happen to have pre-printed signs. You'll recall that Tesla protest where all the demonstrators seemed to depart at the same time, almost as if the "quittin' time!" whistle from The Flintstones had gone off.


Back in the day, the left loved to accuse the Tea Party movement of being "astroturf," A/K/A, fake. Contrived. Phony. But that was just to deflect from the fact that they themselves have big money behind their gripe du jour. The tell is when the protestors are asked to explain why they are participating, and many fumble around for a response or simply spew out talking points. Scratch the surface too much and dollar signs start to appear.

In case you were wondering, Swart says he turned down the money "Good Trouble Lives On" offered because he thought the protests this week would be "ineffective" and "make us look bad."

You mean these are not spontaneous protests? Are you saying the liberal media has been lying to us?

I don’t think anyone is saying that nationwide protests are spontaneous. But I also don’t believe that someone is paying millions of people to come out and protest. That’s just a ludicrous thought.

I don’t think anyone is saying that nationwide protests are spontaneous. But I also don’t believe that someone is paying millions of people to come out and protest. That’s just a ludicrous thought. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

they aren't. the instigators are the ones getting paid .. to start riots. the rest are just tds liberals who'd stand around and shout for no other reason than to do so


and to some people and organizations ... 20 million is pocket lint

they aren't. the instigators are the ones getting paid .. to start riots. the rest are just tds liberals who'd stand around and shout for no other reason than to do so


and to some people and organizations ... 20 million is pocket lint Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

The problem with your theory is that rioting helps justify the use of force. Something that is useful to the state not the protesters.

With that in mind maybe we should be looking at the MAGA crowd for paying said instigators. Or maybe they are the instigators themselves?

The problem with your theory is that rioting helps justify the use of force. Something that is useful to the state not the protesters.

With that in mind maybe we should be looking at the MAGA crowd for paying said instigators. Or maybe they are the instigators themselves? Originally Posted by txdot-guy

the problem with your theory is that no MAGA rallies are violent where most of the Dem "protests" are.


How Democrats enable their perpetually rioting base

apparently .. they pay them


bahahahaaa


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/i...eles-protests/


Democratic politicians have spent the years since 2020 coddling their rioter base, through both rhetorical defenses and deflections, and creating a permissive legal environment that allows rioters to avoid the consequences of their actions.


The Los Angeles riots against Immigration and Customs Enforcement provide the latest example of how Democrats enable rioters. ICE was attempting to deport known criminal illegal immigrants in Los Angeles, which sparked protests that inevitably turned violent. “Protesters” tried to throw rocks and chunks of concrete through the windshields of federal agents’ cars, and it was clear that the situation was going to grow worse.

the problem with your theory is that no MAGA rallies are violent where most of the Dem "protests" are. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Apparently you are willing to ignore the numbers of violent protests that occurred when the Orange Dicktator kept saying the election was stolen back in 2020. Try googling trump rallies violence and see what you get. Political violence occurs on both sides of the aisle. Th idea that someone is paying agitators is not just stupid but unproven as well.

Apparently you are willing to ignore the numbers of violent protests that occurred when the Orange Dicktator kept saying the election was stolen back in 2020. Try googling trump rallies violence and see what you get. Political violence occurs on both sides of the aisle. Th idea that someone is paying agitators is not just stupid but unproven as well. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

nope. your claim, you prove it.

and violence at Trump rallies aren't from Trump supporters. you know that. it's the left that riots not MAGA

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/phot...rally-38755999


Protest Turns Violent at Trump Rally




Protesters opposed to Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump are separated from supporters by a line of riot police officers outside Trump's campaign rally in Costa Mesa, Calif., April 28, 2016.


and from political news .. in cartoons ...





ask yourself why political cartoonists create the above but not many "MAGA Violence" cartoons

bhahaaaa

https://www.the-sun.com/news/1959359...tion-stabbing/
VIOLENCE RAGES Million MAGA March – ‘Four critically stabbed and one shot’ as Proud Boys clash with Antifa at election protests

https://www.thedailybeast.com/bloodi...diana-protest/
Bloodied Trump Fan Pulls AR-Style Rifle in Anti-MAGA Clash at ‘Hands Off’ Rally

https://www.the-sun.com/news/2085751...ump-biden-win/
ELECTION FURY Violence erupts in D.C as MAGA protesters clash with cops after Trump welcomes supporters to protest election loss
Pictures showed clashes between protesters and police following rallies at sites around the nation's capital.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/tru...ct-2024-05-31/
Trump supporters call for riots and violent retribution after verdict

Cartoonists don’t create violent MAGA memes but rather fascist MAGA memes.

Something like this.

congrats you've proven ANTIFA instigates riots at Trump rallies.
let's look further into your left leaning sources shall we?

https://www.the-sun.com/news/1959359...tion-stabbing/
VIOLENCE RAGES Million MAGA March – ‘Four critically stabbed and one shot’ as Proud Boys clash with Antifa at election protests


ANTIFA again

https://www.thedailybeast.com/bloodi...diana-protest/
Bloodied Trump Fan Pulls AR-Style Rifle in Anti-MAGA Clash at ‘Hands Off’ Rally




interesting! and who bloodied this person? ANTIFA

https://www.the-sun.com/news/2085751...ump-biden-win/
ELECTION FURY Violence erupts in D.C as MAGA protesters clash with cops after Trump welcomes supporters to protest election loss
Pictures showed clashes between protesters and police following rallies at sites around the nation's capital.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/tru...ct-2024-05-31/
Trump supporters call for riots and violent retribution after verdict





from your GP article ...


May 31 - Supporters of former President Donald Trump, enraged by his conviction on 34 felony counts by a New York jury, flooded pro-Trump websites with calls for riots, revolution and violent retribution.


After Trump became the first U.S. president to be convicted of a crime, his supporters responded with dozens of violent online posts, according to a Reuters review of comments on three Trump-aligned websites: the former president's own Truth Social platform, Patriots.Win and the Gateway Pundit.


OMG! Chat rooms flooded with angry posts!! sounds like eccie yeah?


show me where any "angry posts" on GP caused one single riot.


Originally Posted by txdot-guy

https://www.the-sun.com/news/1959359...tion-stabbing/
VIOLENCE RAGES Million MAGA March – ‘Four critically stabbed and one shot’ as Proud Boys clash with Antifa at election protests

https://www.thedailybeast.com/bloodi...diana-protest/
Bloodied Trump Fan Pulls AR-Style Rifle in Anti-MAGA Clash at ‘Hands Off’ Rally

https://www.the-sun.com/news/2085751...ump-biden-win/
ELECTION FURY Violence erupts in D.C as MAGA protesters clash with cops after Trump welcomes supporters to protest election loss
Pictures showed clashes between protesters and police following rallies at sites around the nation's capital.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/tru...ct-2024-05-31/
Trump supporters call for riots and violent retribution after verdict Originally Posted by txdot-guy

congrats you've proven ANTIFA instigates riots at Trump rallies.
let's look further into your left leaning sources shall we? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

That is the most blatant unjustified denial possible. Do you really think this is how you make a point or win an argument?

The original post proves nothing other than what it says. It does not prove anything about Democrats or Liberals supporting this or supporting violence. How many millions of people have protested Trump at rallies where there was almost no violence? The answer is millions! Millions that legitimately protest and don't condone violence. You know it. But lie about it that they do every chance you get.

That is the most blatant unjustified denial possible. Do you really think this is how you make a point or win an argument? Originally Posted by DayOfTheEagle

then feel free to prove otherwise. prove that the vast bulk of political violence is not coming from the radical far LEFT




easy, right?

Sounds like "The day of the pigeon" has his panties in a twist.

Apparently you are willing to ignore the numbers of violent protests that occurred when the Orange Dicktator kept saying the election was stolen back in 2020. Try googling trump rallies violence and see what you get. Political violence occurs on both sides of the aisle. Th idea that someone is paying agitators is not just stupid but unproven as well. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Reading the key to understanding...obviously you just post and know nothing about the thread.
Here is the organization website...

https://crowdsondemand.com/blog/fill...xt-event-6jn7p