A Dem fucks up and says the truth we already know.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/imm...-part-out-loud


A resurfaced video clip appears to show Democratic Rep. Yvette Clarke, D-N.Y., claiming she needs more immigrants in her district "just for redistricting purposes," causing significant concern and outrage from conservatives online.

The video, from a 2021 House Foreign Affairs Committee briefing, shows long-time Democrat Clarke suggesting that the local Haitian community in Brooklyn could "absorb a significant number of these migrants."

"When I hear my colleagues talk about, you know, the doors of the inn being closed, no room in the inn, I’m saying, you know, I need more people in my district, just for redistricting purposes and those members could clearly fit here," said Clarke.

In response, Kyle Becker, an author and political commentator, commented on X, "House Rep. Yvette Clarke just said the quiet part out-loud. Democrats are as anti-American as it gets."

"When I hear my colleagues talk about, you know, the doors of the inn being closed, no room in the inn, I’m saying, you know, I need more people in my district, just for redistricting purposes and those members could clearly fit here," said Clarke.

How, do you dare deny that immigrants are being imported to steal elections??

Lol.

Illegal immigrants cannot vote. Illegal immigrants do not vote. They never have. You people are so gullible. FFS.

Illegal immigrants are the vehicle the Dems/globalists want to use to topple the system (capitalism) that all of you reading this benefit from as you have disposable income. You likely won’t in a socialist/welfare state.

Illegals count in the census that determine House of Reps and # of electoral college votes. Hence why the Dems have sanctuary cities. It’s a power grab.

Immigrants vote more Dem when they are able to vote.

Illegals destroy nationalism, the history, and the identity of a country making the people easier to control.

Illegals cause a much, much higher percentage of terrible crimes against women in the European countries that post such data.

You get to pay for this with your tax dollars whether you like it or not.

Every western country is on this path.

You have a binary decision to make for which future you want.

I often wonder how Margie Taylor Green got elected and then I read the comments on this site most of you guys shouldn't even be allowed to vote You have no clue what's legal what's not legal who can vote who can't vote puppets it's a shame You guys need to be ashamed of yourself You need to comment on a whore board because you would be laughed out of any kind of public gathering that knows anything about politics.

Tell me one thing incorrect in my post.

One.

Ps - there is a really cool invention called a period. You put it at the end of a sentence as it adds something to the experience of those that read your thoughts.

Tell me one thing incorrect in my post.

One. Originally Posted by Green_Mountain

You only see binary, which blinds you from the plethora of alternatives and varying options. Since that's the foundational underpining of your entire model... it hold no weight

I often wonder how Margie Taylor Green got elected and then I read the comments on this site most of you guys shouldn't even be allowed to vote You have no clue what's legal what's not legal who can vote who can't vote puppets it's a shame You guys need to be ashamed of yourself You need to comment on a whore board because you would be laughed out of any kind of public gathering that knows anything about politics. Originally Posted by maint729

And I often wonder who sits around passively and watches an administration intentionally open a border to further a political agenda.

Suicidal empathy.

You only see binary Originally Posted by HDGristle

Enlighten us all on the topic.

Have at it.

You only see binary, which blinds you from the plethora of alternatives and varying options. Since that's the foundational underpining of your entire model... it hold no weight Originally Posted by HDGristle

I listed 6-8 thoughts off the top of my head on Devo’s topic.

Which are incorrect from a factual perspective?

Which do you disagree with? Do you agree with any?

If I want to watch the Riddler I’ll put Batman on.

Your whole premise, GM. It reeks of myopic fear and otherism. It's the same position that was used to otherwise those with heritage that's Italian... Irish... Japanese... Chinese.

And yet we persevere. If you can't see the slippery slope, it's because you slid down it already

Riddle me this.

If I’m wrong, why did Biden/Kamala intentionally open the border and allow in millions of unvetted illegals? Why is every western country doing the same?

You can’t dispute that fact. But you can dispute the why.

And personally my myopic, or short term fear is next to zero. The fear is looking at the trend and seeing what it can look like in 5-10-20 years.

Considering you view folks on TPS, asylees and refugees as unvetted illegals I would have to question the premise again.

Did Dems use this supposed advantage to redistrict and crowd out Cons?

Or do both sides gerrymander? I'd argue that Cons did a better job with their gerrymandering over the past 20 years.

What I can tell you as California has gained millions of illegals they get more electoral college votes. And it’s 100% chance going blue. It’s a self fulfilling prophecy.

Also the illegals can increase, or minimize loss of House of Reps for the state. CA Dems have a 43-9 advantage in the US House. While not a 100% it is highly likely any new seats will go to a Dem.

Texas sure has a lot of "illegal population growth"

https://time.com/7304038/gerrymander...s-republicans/

So does FL