Site Admins need to read everything in a thread before acting

I recently posted a thread for spa mongers to beware because 1 spa that recently got busted had a girl working the counter who turned out to be XIII in age.

The thread got some replies about this was observed before and posted about. My post may have been the one that posted the girl's numerical age which was reported in the stories I posted links to.

I got dinged for "post about having sex with a minor" was not the post (which is now deleted) I reported what the news stated.

No where in the post was the mention that *I* or anyone else from this site had sex with this person. The NEWS did that.

So to the mod that dinged me, re-read the stories linked

Like this one:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/...180915786.html

I don't think we are allowed to even post links in regards to something like that, any form of a discussion is a no-no.

Just like we can't post links to news articles about someone being busted if that person is a member. That example is considered outing.

I don't think we are allowed to even post links in regards to something like that, any form of a discussion is a no-no.

Just like we can't post links to news articles about someone being busted if that person is a member. That example is considered outing. Originally Posted by Brooke Wilde

Posting about a spa that got busted happens a lot on here and the yahoo article points out a "concerned citizen" outed them (wonder who that one)

by posting about the place and most likely the REASON they got busted I pointed out that if you walk in and see someone who looks too young it would be best to turn around and leave.