Now that a little time has passed since the fateful day that Charlie Kirk was assassinated many videos and talking points are popping up on the internet posing the question if Tyler Robinson was a patsy. Is he?
There is a video as soon as you go to rense.com stating that a member of Kirk's own security detail wearing a brown shirt (wearing shades) might have assassinated him. I watched the video and the supposed assassins mannerisms do seem strange where they allude to that he may have used a palm gun of sorts. But you don't see a flash when the gun is supposedly fired.
https://rense.com/general98/video-2.mp4
To see the 24/7 Headline News stories on rense.com click down 9 or 10 times when you first go to that website FYI, the middle column.
Jeff Rense further goes on to list a link on rense.com leading to a Youtube video to refute what this Youtuber is saying, "New Shooter Conspiracy Theory Launched To Try To Cover The The Disastrous Failure Of The Tyler ‘Patsy' Robinson Storyline - Then There Are Those Who Swear Charlie Isn’t Dead At All"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbaQadkqkzI
In the Youtube video the guy explains that Kirk was shot from the back, well if Kirk was shot from the back then that would make Tyler Robinson a patsy then correct? Did the FBI recover the actual bullet? You can't be in two places at the same time.
Are we being lied to about what really happened to Charlie Kirk on that fateful day? If so, why?
- CPT Savajo
- Yesterday, 09:10 PM
- ICU 812
- Today, 04:37 AM
A lot of confusing stuff out there for sure.
What I am seeing:
A lot of self incriminating on -line evidence though and the "partner's" statements in person point to him.
The parents would have to be in on it too to set him up as a patsy. . . . .and they too seem genuine.
I think there is confusion about the gun as to what it actually was and is now.. A lot of Mausers were brought back from both WW-I and . WW-II . . . .and many more imported as surplus from countries around the world.
It cold well be that the gun is not on any record in the US. Many were re-chambered from the German ammo to 30-06 in the 1950s and 1960s, then put into a nicer stock and topped with a scope for deer hunting. Any deer hunter could have made that shot I think.
We will get the full story when this goes to trial. The authorities seem to be keeping him on a very strict watch to ensure that he doesn't become another Epstein or Oswald!
What I am seeing:
A lot of self incriminating on -line evidence though and the "partner's" statements in person point to him.
The parents would have to be in on it too to set him up as a patsy. . . . .and they too seem genuine.
I think there is confusion about the gun as to what it actually was and is now.. A lot of Mausers were brought back from both WW-I and . WW-II . . . .and many more imported as surplus from countries around the world.
It cold well be that the gun is not on any record in the US. Many were re-chambered from the German ammo to 30-06 in the 1950s and 1960s, then put into a nicer stock and topped with a scope for deer hunting. Any deer hunter could have made that shot I think.
We will get the full story when this goes to trial. The authorities seem to be keeping him on a very strict watch to ensure that he doesn't become another Epstein or Oswald!