Steel Neck Theory Tested

HDGristle's Avatar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKK4ATVHk8Q

Nate tests a popular theory and it raises inconvenient questions. Let us be clear. He is not a woke soyboy antifa lefty.

What are your thoughts?
eyecu2's Avatar
Cow femur just exploded. I am certain that Kirk was hit by a deflected bullet from his BPV. The video's I've seen that capture the event, are more scientifically showing that as the result. The lack of a spray pattern upon impact is what is strange in the actual event - and is likely the most confusing part of this. I think until the forensics come back with the actual bullet- the question will remain. All the hoopla about Kirks bone density and other supposed comments from the attending Dr's. now are surely being considered as suspect.

Anyone from the FBI or those who have seen human war wounds, were likely saying "that's not what the results of a 30.06 would look like". If it was clean through and through- maybe just the entry hole, but literally watching EVERY other display like the video- demonstrates the ferocity and lethality of that round, and what it does when it contacts both meat and bone. Lots of Military rounds .308 are very close to that same cartridge.

Or was it just the Epsteinth distraction from what's going on the the executive branch??
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKK4ATVHk8Q

Nate tests a popular theory and it raises inconvenient questions. Let us be clear. He is not a woke soyboy antifa lefty.

What are your thoughts? Originally Posted by HDGristle
I think Devo just got a hard on
Devo's Avatar
  • Devo
  • Today, 02:21 PM
And, 62 years later we are still disputing what happened to JFK.

Personally, I think you are getting a bit morbid.

There is nothing to be gained by speculation, other than somehow continuing to smear an innocent mans death.
eyecu2's Avatar
And, 62 years later we are still disputing what happened to JFK.

Personally, I think you are getting a bit morbid.

There is nothing to be gained by speculation, other than somehow continuing to smear an innocent mans death. Originally Posted by Devo
I agree about JFK. Guy wanted to get the best for his country and inspired millions "to ask not what your country can do for you- but what you can do for your country". CK- was innocent mentally not knowing how he kicked the nest- but he certainly did that. Actually they both did- but one was patriotic and the other- was sadly more about pulling the party line and will be remembered as such. I don't know of anyone who feels like that about JFK. Could be that they were both handled by the same group of ppl though.