Are TRANS people really just high definition cross dressers

And you think LGBTQ community put trump back in off by saying there for Democrats. So many people voted against the LGBTQ, even if means voting for trump.

It would help if you spell and grammar checked your post. It is a bit hard to determine exactly what you are saying. No worries, though. The hate and spite still come through clearly.

It would help if... Originally Posted by Eaton Beaver

Imma say it up front first: Wozers! I'm totally aware of the things that happen at 250 BP...

...That's rather considerate and even noble - IMMHO.

Everyone should hit the Like button on this to show him some respect!! Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

The 7 habits of highly effective people ~ Stephen R Covey

If you think about what LBGTQ+-what not is. It's just a ghey-ness scale, i.e. no straight folks. Pick your flavor I guess. As it relates to politics it's just a packaging or bundling operation to create a larger, perhaps stronger, group identity which is still a minority. So a slightly bigger minority.

Think about it, individually, any of the letters represent a very low % in the population, but when added up they almost get closer to low double digits perhaps.

It's like creating a group called "white people" knowing full right well it's a massive collection of people from multiple cultures. Basically, your typical stereotype.

Ironically enough, the Bart Simpson show explained this methodology pretty well back in like 1989 or so.

Image with correct dictionary definition here

Individually we are weak, like a single twig, but as a bundle we form a mighty f*ggot!

As to whether that band of brothers turned people towards Trump: I see it as more of being on the wrong side of an 80/20 issue more than anything.

Are TRANS people really just high definition cross dressers Originally Posted by Ripmany

Lol. That's an interesting way of looking at it, for people who identify with the other sex but haven't done anything about it. When someone progresses to hormones, implants, and man made genitals, it's a step beyond "high definition" IMO.

And you think LGBTQ community put trump back in off by saying there for Democrats. So many people voted against the LGBTQ, even if means voting for trump. Originally Posted by Ripmany

Another interesting hypothesis. I've thought that the Republicans squander votes when they demean the LGBTQ community. For example, my cousin was a Trump supporter who now votes a straight Democratic ticket, after her son become her daughter. But yes, there are many social conservatives, who might not have gone to the trouble to vote if Republicans were pro-LGBTQ, pro choice, etc.

I don't think the big man cares either way. Remember he said Kaitlyn Jenner can use any damn bathroom she chooses when pottying on a Trump property.

It would help if you spell and grammar checked your post. It is a bit hard to determine exactly what you are saying. No worries, though. The hate and spite still come through clearly. Originally Posted by Eaton Beaver

Ripmany can be deceiving Eaton. He writes good prose when he wants to, which is not often. It's hard to know what he really believes. Often you'll think he's serious when he's just joking. And he's smart. I had to pull out an old Circuit Analysis textbook to check one of his posts in a green energy thread. And he was right.

I do suspect he's got anarchistic leanings.

The 7 habits of highly effective people ~ Stephen R Covey mma say it up front first:

Wozers! I'm totally aware of the things that happen at 250 BP...

...That's rather considerate and even noble - IMMHO.

Everyone should hit the Like button on this to show him some respect!! Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

I wasn't sure exactly what you were getting at, but I did like all the posts in this thread.

Are TRANS people really just high definition cross dressers

And you think LGBTQ community put trump back in off by saying there for Democrats. So many people voted against the LGBTQ, even if means voting for trump. Originally Posted by Ripmany

HD cross dressers??? interesting choice of words.

TGs are sick people. theres nothing normal about a man calling himself a female or a female calling herself a male.

....

TGs are sick people. theres nothing normal about a man calling himself a female or a female calling herself a male. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

It seems you have what some would call an "alternate lifestyle" yourself. That is, you pay women "for their time."

Why are you so intolerant of others with alternate lifestyles? Are they hurting you or anyone that you care about? I suspect not.

The same with your activities. They hurt no one. But still, many would not approve of them. Some people might even accuse you of being sick. How are you qualified to say that someone else is?

People who identify as Trans are suffering from a mental illness.

Seems a corner has been turned already.

Transgender Identification in ‘Free Fall’ Among Young Americans
by Katherine Hamilton 14 Oct 2025

Identifying as transgender and queer appears to be “going out of fashion among young people, especially in elite settings,” according to a new report from the Centre for Heterodox Social Science.

The report, authored by Eric Kaufmann, director of the centre and professor of politics at the University of Buckingham, found that transgender and queer identification has dropped sharply among young Americans in Generation Z since 2023. Kaufmann analyzed troves of data from recent surveys about gender and sexuality, including the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) survey, and surveys from elite institutions like Andover Phillips Academy in Boston and Brown University.

“Whether trans and queer identities will drop to 2010 levels is an open question. But the fact both have declined sharply in just two years is a startling and unanticipated post-progressive development that the education and media establishments will be reluctant to acknowledge,” Kaufmann wrote of his research in an article published to UnHerd on Tuesday.

Analyzing raw data from the most recent FIRE survey, which polled over 60,000 students in 2025, Kaufmann found that just 3.6 percent of respondents identified as a “gender” other than male or female. That figures compared to 5.2 percent in 2024 and 6.8 percent in 2022 and 2023.

“In other words, the share of trans-identified students has effectively halved in just two years,” he wrote.

Kaufmann found that surveys at Andover Phillips Academy and Brown University showed and even more pronounced trend. At Andover, 9.2 percent identified as neither male or female in 2023 but crashed to just 3 percent in 2025. At Brown University, that percentage has dropped from 5 percent in 2022 and 2023 to 2.6 percent in 2025...

When looking at more surveys including sexual orientation, the data reflect rising nonconformity from 2010 until 2023, followed by an almost 10-point swing back in 2024 and 2025, Kaufmann found.

“Interestingly, when the trans and queer trends were at their peak, freshmen were more likely to be non-conforming in their gender and sexuality than seniors,” he noted. “Now that BTQ (bisexual, trans, queer or questioning) identification is in decline, the reverse is true: younger students are less BTQ than older students in their colleges. This is a sign that fashions are changing.”...

Plus, there seems to be a growing trend of many self-deporting to other countries.

Obviously, there still needs to be relentless pressure to convert the Indoctrination Centers back in to Learning Institutions, aka schools, to prepare our youth to be self sufficient and ready for the real world.

Besides, EKKY should still be around if'n they want to delve into the Another Realm topics, once the grow the hell up and can make adult decisions themselves.