Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ) was finally sworn in to the House of Representatives by cowardly limp dick Mike Johnson - who did everything he could to cover for his favorite predator.
But after 50 days of protecting his favorite predator during a government shutdown, the pressure got to be too much, and the fakest Christian on earth finally did what was right.
Grijalva's first official act as a U.S. Representative was to sign the discharge petition, and become the 218th and final signature needed to vote on releasing the Epstein files.
In the hours leading up to Grijalva's swearing in, trump personally called Reps. Lauren Boebert and Nancy Mace crying for them to take their signatures off the petition.
Perfectly normal stuff for an innocent man to do, am I right?
Boebert was also brought into the White House for a meeting with Pam Bondi, Kash Patel and others in an effort to influence her decision to sign the petition.
Nothing to see here, folks. Lol.
trumpy bear's in for a whole new world of fresh shit coming his way, and MAGA will be left scrambling to defend this fucking scumbag on a whole new level.
Or as Rep. Eric Swalwell puts it: "this is the beginning of the end".
https://x.com/RepSwalwell/status/1988668476404429026
- jayzee43
- Yesterday, 12:01 PM
- bambino
- Yesterday, 12:53 PM
Check this shit out…
Michael Wolff — the journalist who we just learned was coaching Epstein on how to gain leverage over a presidential candidate — said in an interview that Epstein was growing suspicious that Donald Trump was the one who informed on him and set the stage for when his legal troubles truly began.
Well… Epstein’s legal troubles truly began in March 2005.
And Wolff was pointing to a 2004 real estate dispute over a Palm Beach mansion.
In these newly released emails, we get this line: “the dog that hasn’t barked is trump…”
That stuck with me… and then VOILA, it clicked!
The phrase “the dog that hasn’t barked” comes from Sherlock Holmes’ story called Silver Blaze. In the story:
—— “The stable had a guard dog. On the night of the crime, the dog did not bark. Which meant — the intruder must have been someone the dog knew. Otherwise, it would’ve barked.”
So… who was redacted in that email? Virginia Giuffre.
Epstein wrote he was “75% there” — meaning 75% sure it was Trump as the silent informant, with Giuffre as the likely conduit for the tip-off knowledge.
This email tells me Epstein was trying to find the leak after a British tabloid started exposing his network — and he was emailing associates to hunt down the source.
THEN, we have Attorney Bradley Edwards — who, in 2009, praised Donald Trump for being the ONLY subpoenaed person to willingly provide helpful information about Epstein.
— “Donald Trump was the only person who would pick up the phone…”
— “He gave very good information that checked out and was very helpful.”
THEN, just a few months ago, we heard Mike Johnson say Trump was an FBI informant trying to take Epstein down. Oopsie…
Epstein and Maxwell were finally arrested — under the Trump administration.
In Epstein’s own words, the timeline, the motive, the silence, the cooperation, the arrests — everything points to one conclusion:
Donald Trump was the informant who helped take down one of the most prolific p******** and blackmail operations in history.
A lot of people are gonna owe him an apology when this is done.
Boomerang incoming!!!!!
BAHAHAHA
Michael Wolff — the journalist who we just learned was coaching Epstein on how to gain leverage over a presidential candidate — said in an interview that Epstein was growing suspicious that Donald Trump was the one who informed on him and set the stage for when his legal troubles truly began.
Well… Epstein’s legal troubles truly began in March 2005.
And Wolff was pointing to a 2004 real estate dispute over a Palm Beach mansion.
In these newly released emails, we get this line: “the dog that hasn’t barked is trump…”
That stuck with me… and then VOILA, it clicked!
The phrase “the dog that hasn’t barked” comes from Sherlock Holmes’ story called Silver Blaze. In the story:
—— “The stable had a guard dog. On the night of the crime, the dog did not bark. Which meant — the intruder must have been someone the dog knew. Otherwise, it would’ve barked.”
So… who was redacted in that email? Virginia Giuffre.
Epstein wrote he was “75% there” — meaning 75% sure it was Trump as the silent informant, with Giuffre as the likely conduit for the tip-off knowledge.
This email tells me Epstein was trying to find the leak after a British tabloid started exposing his network — and he was emailing associates to hunt down the source.
THEN, we have Attorney Bradley Edwards — who, in 2009, praised Donald Trump for being the ONLY subpoenaed person to willingly provide helpful information about Epstein.
— “Donald Trump was the only person who would pick up the phone…”
— “He gave very good information that checked out and was very helpful.”
THEN, just a few months ago, we heard Mike Johnson say Trump was an FBI informant trying to take Epstein down. Oopsie…
Epstein and Maxwell were finally arrested — under the Trump administration.
In Epstein’s own words, the timeline, the motive, the silence, the cooperation, the arrests — everything points to one conclusion:
Donald Trump was the informant who helped take down one of the most prolific p******** and blackmail operations in history.
A lot of people are gonna owe him an apology when this is done.
Boomerang incoming!!!!!
BAHAHAHA
- bambino
- Yesterday, 12:54 PM
Dammmmmmm ��
Stephen A. Smith goes off on Democrats who all of the sudden are interested in the Epstein Files
“Keep in mind that the Epstein files were in the existence and free to have been opened during the Biden administration! You were there for 4 years! How come you didn’t open it as the Democratic Party then? What am I missing?… see, this is the kind of stuff that smells..”
https://rumble.com/v71nnhi-stephen-s...f-the-sud.html
Stephen A. Smith goes off on Democrats who all of the sudden are interested in the Epstein Files
“Keep in mind that the Epstein files were in the existence and free to have been opened during the Biden administration! You were there for 4 years! How come you didn’t open it as the Democratic Party then? What am I missing?… see, this is the kind of stuff that smells..”
https://rumble.com/v71nnhi-stephen-s...f-the-sud.html
- bambino
- Yesterday, 12:54 PM
David Schoen:
David Schoen consulted with Jeffrey Epstein in person and by phone multiple times while Epstein was in jail in 2019.
During those private conversations, Schoen directly asked Epstein if he had any information that could hurt Donald Trump. Epstein said no. He had nothing whatsoever.
Schoen was considering taking over as lead defense counsel 9 days before Epstein’s death but never formally agreed and Epstein died before a decision was made.
David Schoen consulted with Jeffrey Epstein in person and by phone multiple times while Epstein was in jail in 2019.
During those private conversations, Schoen directly asked Epstein if he had any information that could hurt Donald Trump. Epstein said no. He had nothing whatsoever.
Schoen was considering taking over as lead defense counsel 9 days before Epstein’s death but never formally agreed and Epstein died before a decision was made.
- bambino
- Yesterday, 12:56 PM
BREAKING: Author Michael Wolff reportedly urged Jeffrey Epstein to blackmail then-presidential candidate Donald Trump, claiming Epstein could use it to create “leverage” over him.
@GeneralMCNews
@GeneralMCNews
- jayzee43
- Yesterday, 01:09 PM
Dammmmmmm ��One big reason: Democrats never campaigned on releasing them. trump did, until he was told his name was on nearly every page of the files.
Stephen A. Smith goes off on Democrats who all of the sudden are interested in the Epstein Files
“Keep in mind that the Epstein files were in the existence and free to have been opened during the Biden administration! You were there for 4 years! How come you didn’t open it as the Democratic Party then? What am I missing?… see, this is the kind of stuff that smells..”
https://rumble.com/v71nnhi-stephen-s...f-the-sud.html Originally Posted by bambino
And now? It's just another "Democrat hoax", according to the retarded MAGA cultists. Otherwise, they'd have to admit to themselves who and what they voted for.
It's painfully obvious why trump wants these files buried. But he's got a gigantic shit sandwich heading his way.
Dozens, if not 100 or more, Republicans will be defecting from Dear Leader's wishes by voting to release them. "This is the beginning of the end"
- Green_Mountain
- Yesterday, 01:09 PM
Dammmmmmm ��This.
Stephen A. Smith goes off on Democrats who all of the sudden are interested in the Epstein Files
“Keep in mind that the Epstein files were in the existence and free to have been opened during the Biden administration! You were there for 4 years! How come you didn’t open it as the Democratic Party then? What am I missing?… see, this is the kind of stuff that smells..”
https://rumble.com/v71nnhi-stephen-s...f-the-sud.html Originally Posted by bambino
The libs are dumber than dumb to think Kamala and potato head Joe held back this info pre-election, if anything was damning for Trump.
- jayzee43
- Yesterday, 01:12 PM
This.Lol. It's cute that you believe trump's name isn't ALL OVER the Epstein files. Just based on what we know so far, he's fucking guilty as sin.
The libs are dumber than dumb to think Kamala and potato head Joe held back this info pre-election, if anything was damning for Trump. Originally Posted by Green_Mountain
But yeah... keep blaming the libs for your guy being a deranged predator.
- Green_Mountain
- Yesterday, 01:19 PM
Lol. It's cute that you believe trump's name isn't ALL OVER the Epstein files. Just based on what we know so far, he's fucking guilty as sin.It’s cuter you believe Biden and Kamala wouldn’t release the files pre-election, if Trump was seen in a negative way.
But yeah... keep blaming the libs for your guy being a deranged predator. Originally Posted by jayzee43
Can’t pull the wool over your eyes!
- jayzee43
- Yesterday, 01:30 PM
It’s cuter you believe Biden and Kamala wouldn’t release the files pre-election, if trump was seen in a negative way.Haven't been paying attention, have you? trump is definitely being seen in a negative way, based just on what we know so far.
Can’t pull the wool over your eyes! Originally Posted by Green_Mountain
As for your cute, little narrative about Kamala and Biden... that was last year. THIS YEAR, 2025, it's every single Democrat who is voting to release them. Plenty of Republicans are on board, too.
The only people fighting to NOT release them right now? trump and his merry band of sycophants.
Stop living in the past. Or don't. It really doesn't matter. We have the votes. More than enough, actually. Brace yourself. Or don't. It really doesn't matter.
- bambino
- Yesterday, 01:41 PM
It’s cuter you believe Biden and Kamala wouldn’t release the files pre-election, if Trump was seen in a negative way.You would think after the Russian Hoax, Impeachments, J6, Bogus indictments that the TDS crowd would actually learn something. But they keep getting bitchslapped and ask for more!!!!!
Can’t pull the wool over your eyes! Originally Posted by Green_Mountain
- bambino
- Yesterday, 01:45 PM
Lol. It's cute that you believe trump's name isn't ALL OVER the Epstein files. Just based on what we know so far, he's fucking guilty as sin.What do YOU know so far? Obviously nothing. The Dems blocked the Epstein files again last night!!!!
But yeah... keep blaming the libs for your guy being a deranged predator. Originally Posted by jayzee43
Why would democrats block the Epstein files? That’s weird… 🤔
🚨 #BREAKING — Republican Rep. Tim Burchett attempted a unanimous consent request to bring the Epstein files directly to the House floor—blocked by Democrats.
"They had it for 4 years, and obviously if there was something there about Trump, they would have released it. And now they're all, 'Let's get it out, let's get it out!' Well, I just made a motion to bring it straight to the floor, and they blocked it."
https://rumble.com/v71mdts-democrats...s-release.html
- Green_Mountain
- Yesterday, 01:49 PM
What do YOU know so far? Obviously nothing. The Dems blocked the Epstein files again last night!!!!
Why would democrats block the Epstein files? That’s weird… 🤔
🚨 #BREAKING — Republican Rep. Tim Burchett attempted a unanimous consent request to bring the Epstein files directly to the House floor—blocked by Democrats.
"They had it for 4 years, and obviously if there was something there about Trump, they would have released it. And now they're all, 'Let's get it out, let's get it out!' Well, I just made a motion to bring it straight to the floor, and they blocked it."
https://rumble.com/v71mdts-democrats...s-release.html Originally Posted by bambino
- jayzee43
- Yesterday, 01:54 PM
"bUt JoE & kAmaLa DiDn'T rELeAsE tHeM LaSt YeAr!"
Everyone understands that's MAGA's new narrative. Problem is, it's not sticking. MAGA, as always, is trying to live in the past. It's like you guys haven't been paying attention for at least the last week.
20,000 new files were just released within the last 48 hours. It's a whole new ballgame, and trump won't be getting much sleep any time soon.
Why did trump personally call Boebert and Mace and plead with them to remove their signatures? Why did Bondi and Kash try to pressure Boebert in a face-to-face meeting just yesterday at the 11th hour?
Answer those questions. Nobody cares about your little narrative to cover up for your favorite predator.
Everyone understands that's MAGA's new narrative. Problem is, it's not sticking. MAGA, as always, is trying to live in the past. It's like you guys haven't been paying attention for at least the last week.
20,000 new files were just released within the last 48 hours. It's a whole new ballgame, and trump won't be getting much sleep any time soon.
Why did trump personally call Boebert and Mace and plead with them to remove their signatures? Why did Bondi and Kash try to pressure Boebert in a face-to-face meeting just yesterday at the 11th hour?
Answer those questions. Nobody cares about your little narrative to cover up for your favorite predator.
- bambino
- Yesterday, 02:01 PM
"bUt JoE & kAmaLa DiDn'T rELeAsE tHeM LaSt YeAr!"This is your thread and narrative and it’s already been destroyed. But you do you JayVee!!!!!!!
Everyone understands that's MAGA's new narrative. Problem is, it's not sticking. MAGA, as always, is trying to live in the past. It's like you guys haven't been paying attention for at least the last week.
20,000 new files were just released within the last 48 hours. It's a whole new ballgame, and trump won't be getting much sleep any time soon.
Why did trump personally call Boebert and Mace and plead with them to remove their signatures? Why did Bondi and Kash try to pressure Boebert in a face-to-face meeting just yesterday at the 11th hour?
Answer those questions. Nobody cares about your little narrative to cover up for your favorite predator. Originally Posted by jayzee43