omitting detailed activities doesn’t deter LE, does’t take a genius to spot a provider or spa that’s offering more than just a massage, posting traffic is a dead giveaway.
Originally Posted by Someoneintx
It certainly does help. The main pathways that AMPs get busted are currently:
- Nosy Karen sees a bunch of men going into an AMP, convinces herself that these women are trafficked (when in actuality they're just businesswoman that're very clear on the financial advantages of sex work), and files a complaint with the local PD. Karens aren't typically sophisticated and will just google the place, and if they see eccie reviews with publicly visible explicit information that's going to be a problem. This is what caused Lewisville to launch their raids a few years ago because a Karen threw a giant fuss and forced the local PD's hand:
https://www.wfaa.com/article/news/lo...6-8d1c37af296d
However, if the reviewer scrambles the phone number of the place and is careful not to expose info publicly, then the Karen will not see any eccie reviews when googling the place, and in the off change that they do come across the review all they'd see is that someone visited that place at a certain date and nothing else.
- Police see a bunch of reviews on a place. But they're not stupid, they know that basically every single masseuse whether legit or erotic will give a HE to a customer if that customer is generously tipping, because the money is simply too good to turn down for the amount of additional effort that's required. Now a single report won't trigger their attention as much as it could be chalked off as an one time or opportunistic thing, but if multiple reviews of a place pop up all with the dirty details exposed then that spot gets fast-tracked for undercover LE to start investigating as it takes time for LE to visit in person, collect evidence, and build a case, and they'll want to focus their efforts on cases that are obvious slam dunks. Excessive reviews contribute to this, as each additional review adds to their certainty that something unlawful is going on. The best way to combat this is by being very vague in your reviews; it's easy for an officer to say to his captain "look this reviewer explicit said the masseuse $#cked his wiener and $wallowed his babies" and have enough evidence to issue a warrant, but it's much more difficult for that same officer to convince his captain if the review is more along the lines of "we stared into each other's eyes and felt the joy of several generations coursing through us". As hobbyists we can probably infer enough to figure whether we want to visit or not from the latter, but for a police dept that usually has several pressing priorities to tackle such evidence wouldn't be compelling enough to issue a warrant or start an investigation.