on the topic of cameras there's a big difference to me between monitoring and recording. I would hope the owners would see recordings to be more risk than they're worth, since I would think siezed recordings could be presented as evidence supporting stacked charges for "multiple offenses".
on legality - the law does appear to be vague by listing crimes crimes for sexual activity.
[I]"Sexual activity." Includes sexual intercourse and deviate sexual intercourse, as those terms are defined in section 3101 (relating to definitions), and any touching on the sexual or other intimate parts of an individual for the purpose of gratifying sexual desire of either person.[/I
[/PRIVATE][/PRIVATE]
I found opinions saying sexual activity isn't clearly defined anywhere. But even without that, and any touching on the sexual or other intimate parts of an individual doesn't say 'of another individual'. So I guess sperm donations at fertility clinics could technically be considered prostitution, too?
Originally Posted by mxxxxm
The media would have a field day if they were found out they had cameras in rooms and recording customers. It doesn't matter what they sign-in sheets say, they advertise as a "massage" studio and they are technically transparent about the cameras in the massage rooms.