Tattoos are sexy as hell. My fave is a brunette (preferably dark, black hair) and tatted up! Nothing hotter than that.
Tatts on shoulder down the arm
Lower back tatt ending in a point or arrow just at the nape/apex of her ass
Bigger on upper body tatts
Although I have zero tatts, this is so sexy on certain women. I do not look for this in all women. When the right fem does it, it's sexy though and not a turn-off (but if there are other issues such as appearance, dinginess, etc then the whole package is a turn-off)
The less tattoos and piercing, the better for me. Zero tattoos and zero piercings is the best situation.
It totally depends on the quality of the art and the canvas the art is painted on. Cheap jailhouse tats are not attractive to me. However I've noticed quite a few ladies with the suicide girl look that are fuckin beautiful. Now how good will an entire torso look when she's 50 or 60 only time will tell. But right now I think it looks pretty sexy.
No tats & No Piercings means what?? besides shes a virgin to body art.
It is a fad that will pass and a lot of people are going to be stuck with a lot of tattoos they wish they had never got. Pat Paulsen ran for President many years ago and he had the only tattoo I ever liked it said "Born Too Loose".
From a business mind, 2 things:
1. Tattoo removal (upper echelon)
2. Tattoo upgrades/enhancements (youbknow, like breastesses)
Okay, ignore that...just got my new business plan for eternity.
This is NOT a fad. I'm in bidness folks.
Sexy asses
I really think it depends on the tattoo and how it is displayed. I like mine.
While one or two tatoos may be OK, I do not find them sexy or attractive. I have seen many old tatoos on elderly veterens, and none of them age well. Imagine a 50 year old huka girl, or a once fierce snake on a sagging bicep.
Most definitely; be it a tramp stamp, cramp stamp, back piece, or a little butterfly fluttering around her genital area. Only turnoffs would be facial tats or artwork on a perfect set of breasts, Julia Bond being the exception to the latter.
I saw a lady very recently who has a great set of breasts and it would be an absolute travesty to see her do anything to detract from them.
I have never seen anything, ink, cloth or leather that I would want or expect a person to wear for the rest of their life. Like clothes tattoos show the effects of time.
I prefer not, but have see a lot of ladies who have them. Unless gross they are not a deal buster.
One or two small tattoo's is not a big deal, whole body covered in ink, yuk.
I also think it is important to be able to cover up the tat's for a classy look in little black dresses.
I doubt anybody has more tattoos than my ATF. Before I met Her, I might have been in the camp of those who didn't care for them.
I guess now I can honestly say I could care less. Maybe all of the ink on someone else would be different. But on Sarah, well, she came with the ink, and for some reason, I don't even notice. I guess I like the rest of the package to the extent that I don't let something of no cosequence get in the way of a good time.
To each his own.