A couple interesting feeds on freedom

A couple interesting feeds on freedom....

L.A. City Council OKs law requiring condom use by porn performers

http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jan...ndoms-20120118

Although I see this mostly as a win, I do question the free choice part of it and the surprise government inspections....

I do, however, like it for the safety value. I also believe it will allow us to help fight any illegal porn. So, all in all, yeah, I'm for it. It might help eliminate child pornography and sex slaves. Let's hope.


On a another note, there is a bill that would make it illegal to Photoshop someone's head on the nude or obscenely positioned body of another.
http://www.11alive.com/news/article/...on-nude-bodies

It didn't mention anything about voo doo dolls.

We all agree that freedom has limits. The tricky part is to decide where the limits are. Just look at the controversy over the freedom to ride a bike without helmets.

Indeed...

I think hobbying/providing is similar, in that research is done to see what kind of "views" a lady or gent holds. We sometimes choose our preferred people just as we do in our politics.

Such as: a provider's view on cfs versus bbfs, or a gent's view on preferred age range.

This board is a perfect place to explore these things in depth.

It reminds me of the waitress "Practicing Politics", referred to in the song The Piano Man.

Billy Joel - Piano Man


helmet law sucks as is for motor bikes and bikes. I'm not so keen seat belt also

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ylRplLnU84

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCOIe...feature=fvwrel