More Obama vetting; Dem Congressman accepts award from communists

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...res-our-values

Democratic Congressman Danny Davis accepts an award from the Communist Party USA in Chicago. Eight years ago this congressman was introduced by Barack Obama who told his audience that Davis shares Obama's views on the world. Birds of a feather...are communists apparently.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...res-our-values

Democratic Congressman Danny Davis accepts an award from the Communist Party USA in Chicago. Eight years ago this congressman was introduced by Barack Obama who told his audience that Davis shares Obama's views on the world. Birds of a feather...are communists apparently. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

You could be right. See the thread, "Are all conservatives Traitors?"
It uses your brand of "logic".

PS You are an asshole of legendary proportions. And yes, you can suck my dick....one inch at a time.

Beerfarts credibility has been dead longer than he has

nice try tho, JD

Is the article wrong, CBJ7? If it is untrue please let us know. Otherwise, please try to contribute something other than defamation of a dead guy to this thread. I thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Is the article wrong, CBJ7? If it is untrue please let us know. Otherwise, please try to contribute something other than defamation of a dead guy to this thread. I thank you in advance for your cooperation. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

how many atricles/tapes did beerfart edit previously?


IMO, 1 wrong ALL wrong

You, as usual, are avoiding the question. Is this article wrong? That's all. Since you seem to know, please provide some information showing it is false. Now, I hate to be rude, but please try to contribute something that makes sense. If you don't soon post something relevant, I will be left with no choice but to question your sexuality. Don't make me go there!

Then by that standard C7 doesnt that exclude any outlet that has ever had to retract a story or in any way editted footage for a broadcast?

You, as usual, are avoiding the question. Is this article wrong? That's all. Since you seem to know, please provide some information showing it is false. Now, I hate to be rude, but please try to contribute something that makes sense. If you don't soon post something relevant, I will be left with no choice but to question your sexuality. Don't make me go there! Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I cant say its wrong and you cant say its right

get it now?


no Fn credibility

The End

You mean you don't want to find out. How sad, CBJ7. I had such hope for you. *sigh* Oh, well, you forced me into it. You homo! There. That should settle matters now.

You mean you don't want to find out. How sad, CBJ7. I had such hope for you. *sigh* Oh, well, you forced me into it. You homo! There. That should settle matters now. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

so prove ME wrong or the article 100% correct


which ever comes first

In standard rules, the article is presumed true until shown otherwise. You brought it up, you prove it. I've already had to release the sexuality insult. Don't make me go farther. You have been warned.

In standard rules, the article is presumed true until shown otherwise. You brought it up, you prove it. I've already had to release the sexuality insult. Don't make me go farther. You have been warned. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

yeah, I was crushed I tells ya ... homo

woe is me.

nonetheless, Beerfarts credibility or lack thereof, precedes his dead ass.

AND ANOTHER THING ...


riddle me this lawdog ... you're doing a cross, you catch a witness in 1 lie

does he/she have credibility with the jury?

Apples and oranges, my friend. Yes, catching a witness in a lie damages credibility, but I would still have to show that subsequent statements are also lies. Or I could use that lie to discredit truth in later testimony. So I would still like to know, is the article true, or not? Answer the question, because I will have to use fonts of different color and sizes to prove my superiority.

Apples and oranges, my friend. Yes, catching a witness in a lie damages credibility, but I would still have to show that subsequent statements are also lies. Or I could use that lie to discredit truth in later testimony. So I would still like to know, is the article true, or not? Answer the question, because I will have to use fonts of different color and sizes to prove my superiority. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

1 lie establishes reasonable doubt in the jurys mind/s, subsequent statements be damned .. the witness cant be trusted, PERIOD.

I suppose I'll need larger fonts to help you understand I already answered your true or false question