Okay, as I was thinking (I know, it's a filthy habit, but I really can't help myself) my mind came upon a strange paradox. I know some guys who fit the whole womanizer thing pretty accurately. They can't seem to stick with one girl at all for one reason or another. But here is the weird part. They all have a pornstar they are fiercly loyal to. I mean they will take it like you insulted their wife if you say "Eh, I'm not that in to her." This confuses me. It seems contradictor to not be able to build such emotional bonds with people you actually met but to do so with someone you may have only talked to in a chat room at most.
Then the thought hit me, maybe the whole conquest idealogy is at play. They hook up with a girl and it ends something within them. But the pornstar attracts them so much because even though they know that the woman is a sexual being, they can never have her, so they never are "through" with her.
And yes, I know, this is all community college level psychology, but here is where my weird thought appeared. I started wondering how someone may use that to actaully build that sort of bond with an actual person instead of a celebrity (in other words the idea of a person). And it hit me. What if a couple meet up and never actually have sex together. Every sexual encounter either is just watching each other during mutual masterbation or one person has sex with a completely different person while the other one watches. That's why I call the thought "Personal Pornstar" because I would imagine it would be like having your very own pornstar performing scenes just for you in person. Needless to say I find the thought intriguing.