Is it really that hard to put all the Standard info in a review???

So this is partly a vent and partly a request to those writing a review.

There are about 19/20 sections to fill in/complete when writing a review. Of those at least 5/6 are super important to those who are reading them to make thier decision on whether or not they would like to see that person. Unless you have PA (Premium Access) then you don't get to read and know the ROS, so not much control over that for a reviewer.

HOWEVER, and here is my vent/rant...WTH is up with putting "see ROS" for
Activities:
Fee:
Physical description:

Especially Activities:

These sections are meant for ALL to see for a reason and that is for those who DON'T have PA to be able to make the best decision possible based on the Standard information. What I mean by "standard" are the sections that are open for all to see and not just for PA members.

Quit holding back that information. I mean seriously!!!!!

My opinion, if that information is not where it SHOULD be and only in ROS then that person should NOT get credit for that review.

Mods, are there any "rules" about putting information only in ROS and not in the specific section so all can see?

totally agree Jake Ryan.....

one other thing is when reviewers says to "see ad" or "special" for donation..

honestly - no one should have to surf all over eccie looking for things relating to how to contact a provider, fee information, or things like that

My favorite is in description: "She had the the body type I love" WTF dude, what IS that? Fat, 3'11', 7'4'', no boobs, comes with a penis????

Get a clue, seriously!!

HOWEVER, and here is my vent/rant...WTH is up with putting "see ROS" for
Activities:
Fee:
Physical description:

Especially Activities: Originally Posted by Jake Ryan

Some times I just don't have the patients to read all the details to figure out all the activities.

What if in the ROS the guy post: she starts up a BJ...well was it covered or bare?

Hell even the Providers read the Activities to see what the guys like:

I particularly liked the activities listed in the review by hobbyisthandle (gives the girl a heads up on what you like & that you paid attention to the services she provides). Originally Posted by atxdream

Quote came from this thread: http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=420719

I find it difficult to put the price in when I know she has given me a rate and or we have spent quiet time together beyond what I am paying for. I have contacted the provider once or twice to confirm what she wants me to show as the price. I generally wait a week before I write the review to prepare what I want to write.
My big bitch on reviews is that the providers name is not in the title line

totally agree Jake Ryan.....

one other thing is when reviewers says to "see ad" or "special" for donation..

honestly - no one should have to surf all over eccie looking for things relating to how to contact a provider, fee information, or things like that Originally Posted by dennisrn

Ditto that. Hey, YOU are the one trying to get PA credit, YOU pull up a second browser window and go to her showcase and cut and paste.
If I'm inspired by your review, I want one stop shopping!

I 2nd this vent. Thank you Levi for bringing up the provider's POV and dennis for pointing out missing provider's contact info. I use reviews as part of my screening process when applicable. Ladies don't (or shouldn't) have access to ROS. There are some key things I look for when evaluating someone who'd like to see me. I look for the typical rate they pay, the type of lady they see (physical description) , and activities they enjoyed.

So often, when asked for refs, hobbyists will say "anyone I've reviewed"; however, they don't put full handles or link to showcases in their review and there are way too many ladies with similar names. I've never declined to see someone based on what I can see of a review; however, there have been plenty of times that I've asked a clarifying question.

For example, recently someone requested to see me and their reviews indicated that they typically pay between 80-140 for an hr appt. I'm outside that rate and they weren't aware, so it saved us both an uncomfortable convo later. In the past, before my sig line indicated, if someone had greek in several of their reviews, I would clarify that it wasn't a deal breaker before our scheduled meet. Sometimes it has been, but I'd rather they find a lady that meets their needs than be disappointed bc I didn't offer the menu they like.

Hobbyists get a LOT of info about providers before they meet us and we get very little. Just the basic publically viewable info in the reviews, provides us insight on how we can make the appt extra special.

So if you are taking the time to review, do your fellow hobbyists right by including the info requested and do yourself a favor by helping your next provider (who takes the time to research you) prepare to make your time with her great.

My big bitch on reviews is that the providers name is not in the title line Originally Posted by tucson

If you find one like that use the icon that appears to the left of the post to report it to the Staff. We can edit the review and fix that.

I always fix such reviews whenever I encounter them.

If you find one like that use the icon that appears to the left of the post to report it to the Staff. We can edit the review and fix that. Originally Posted by Mokoa

Thanks Mokoa, I wondered about that.

That's why atxdream is great to meet. Always has great replies to posts and gives honest opinion. I love it.

B35h

That's why atxdream is great to meet. Always has great replies to posts and gives honest opinion. I love it.

B35h Originally Posted by big35hurt

Aww thank you!