What A Friend We Have in Obama

I know Obama planned and executed the bin Laden operation entirely on his own with no input from anyone else, but this guy did try to help. He was on our side.

So he gets convicted of treason and sentenced to 33 years, simply because he tried to help us. And what does our President do? Nothing.

Thank you, Mr. President!

http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/23/ob...d-for-treason/

I know Obama planned and executed the bin Laden operation entirely on his own with no input from anyone else, Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I know you honestly think Obama thinks that, but no.

So he gets convicted of treason and sentenced to 33 years, simply because he tried to help us. And what does our President do? Nothing.

Thank you, Mr. President!

And what's he supposed to do? And perhaps you can also clarify when, in the libertarian world, it's ok to interfere in another country's justice system.

I know Obama planned and executed the bin Laden operation entirely on his own with no input from anyone else, but this guy did try to help. He was on our side.

So he gets convicted of treason and sentenced to 33 years, simply because he tried to help us. And what does our President do? Nothing.

Thank you, Mr. President!

http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/23/ob...d-for-treason/

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I think you are suffering from the vapors COF He was just sentenced today,and the congress has taken 1mil for each year of his sentence .Not even your hero Bush could have acted that quick.there is always seal team 6

I know you honestly think Obama thinks that, but no.



And what's he supposed to do? And perhaps you can also clarify when, in the libertarian world, it's ok to interfere in another country's justice system. Originally Posted by Doove

It's unlikely a Libertarian administration would have put him in that position. Nevertheless, it's wrong to leave someone on the battlefield, regardless of your ideology.

Haha Doove, great joke. We can't interfere with another countries justice system but we can fly into another country, kill people, and take off again. Just don't mess with their justice system. Sometimes you kill me.

Haha Doove, great joke. We can't interfere with another countries justice system but we can fly into another country, kill people, and take off again. Just don't mess with their justice system. Sometimes you kill me. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Didn't say i thought that.

You're a teacher?

It's unlikely a Libertarian administration would have put him in that position. Nevertheless, it's wrong to leave someone on the battlefield, regardless of your ideology.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

And what do you think could/should have been done?

Sitting at your computer and posting critical comments is easy. Dealing with complicated world affairs? Not so much.

. . . posting critical comments is easy. Dealing with complicated world affairs? Not so much. Originally Posted by Doove

But Doofus, you voted for Odumbo anyway!?!?

I know Obama planned and executed the bin Laden operation entirely on his own with no input from anyone else, but this guy did try to help. He was on our side.

So he gets convicted of treason and sentenced to 33 years, simply because he tried to help us. And what does our President do? Nothing.

Thank you, Mr. President!

http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/23/ob...d-for-treason/

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

God, I tire of you mongoloid drones who have been programmed by the right-wing media to try to blame President Obama for every fucking thing in the world that goes wrong. How is this his fault? Oh, wait....you're the Osama apologist who thinks the US operators should have played tiddlywinks with Bin Laden in an interrogation room instead of greasing his murdering ass.

So....what should Obama do COG?

And, by the way, doesn't the story state that he already is doing something by objecting to the sentence and charge and by engaging in efforts to reduce the sentence?

And, by the way, how do you know he isn't doing even more than that?

It's unlikely a Libertarian administration would have put him in that position. Nevertheless, it's wrong to leave someone on the battlefield, regardless of your ideology.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

He put himself in that position. And I bet he was well-paid for it. I'll also bet he was offered the option of getting out of his stinking shit-hole of a country subsequent to the completion of his role in the operation and he declined....obviously misreading the situation.

So...be the libertardian you claim to be and put the responsibility for this little fiasco where it belongs.

He put himself in that position. And I bet he was well-paid for it. I'll also bet he was offered the option of getting out of his stinking shit-hole of a country subsequent to the completion of his role in the operation and he declined....obviously misreading the situation.

So...be the libertardian you claim to be and put the responsibility for this little fiasco where it belongs. Originally Posted by timpage

Timmy, you are making up facts that support your position, but there is no evidence that they are true. Fact is, you don't know. Fact is, the guy tried to help us, and we have left him hanging in the wind. Not a good policy.

And for the record, I don't have a TV. I don't watch right wing media, and I listen to jazz and NPR on the radio.

Try your next stereotype, please. And make it a good one so you can criticize it without referring to any facts.

Timmy, you are making up facts that support your position, but there is no evidence that they are true. Fact is, you don't know. Fact is, the guy tried to help us, and we have left him hanging in the wind. Not a good policy.

And for the record, I don't have a TV. I don't watch right wing media, and I listen to jazz and NPR on the radio.

Try your next stereotype, please. And make it a good one so you can criticize it without referring to any facts.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

More non-answers from the non-answering shit-stirrer. What should he do COG? And how do you know he's not doing something? Answers please.

I guess you must surf all those right-wing websites that you link us to every single day between Fresh Air and Coltrane?

So you're ok with leaving the guy to rot. Fine. I'm not that way. There are many options open to the President, including saying and doing nothing. I just don't think that's the best policy.

Now, like you, I could make up facts to support my position. But I'm not that way. This is the story. I hope there is something going on in the background, but I would doubt it. Obama doesn't care, anymore. He got bin Laden and the issue, and nothing else matters.

Thanks for playing! Timmy. It's nice to see you try.

I know you honestly think Obama thinks that, but no.



And what's he supposed to do? And perhaps you can also clarify when, in the libertarian world, it's ok to interfere in another country's justice system. Originally Posted by Doove

It's ok to interfer when 1, they knowingly provided safe haven for him. 2. and more inportantly. It's ok to interfere when you are providing them millions anually for aid.

It's ok to interfer when 1, they knowingly provided safe haven for him. 2. and more inportantly. It's ok to interfere when you are providing them millions anually for aid. Originally Posted by datyking

Exactly, cut their funding, get out of there and let India wipe their feet on them.