Sweden - The Sensible Welfare State

Sweden is tracking more and more conservative after learning some very hard lessons in Keynesian economics. They are coming back from where we are headed. It might do our leaders well to take a look at Sweden.

http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com...welfare-state/

And try to emmigrate ti Sweden. Near impossible. They enforce border security.

And try to emmigrate ti Sweden. Near impossible. They enforce border security. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Sweden is being overrun with third world Muslim immigrants like most of Europe. Sweden has serious problems with Muslim crime especially rape.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2004/09/mu...dish-city.html

http://majorityrights.com/weblog/com...ave_in_sweden/

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/938

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5a1PM6YB8wg

http://undhimmi.com/2010/04/27/musli...-kindergarten/

So. If the Vikings had colonized the new world instead of the Spanish, would we be overrun with tall blonds mowing lawns and meatball stands on the corner in most Texas towns?

So. If the Vikings had colonized the new world instead of the Spanish, would we be overrun with tall blonds mowing lawns and meatball stands on the corner in most Texas towns? Originally Posted by Iaintliein

If we were being overrun with hot blonde female illegal aliens. I might change to an open border policy overnight.

Speaking of Scandinavia, a friend of mine goes to Norway on business occasionally. He says the women are incredibly beautiful.

Sweden is tracking more and more conservative after learning some very hard lessons in Keynesian economics. They are coming back from where we are headed. It might do our leaders well to take a look at Sweden.

http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com...welfare-state/

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

this country is stuck in limbo because of Keynesian-trickle (piss) down (your leg) - bullshit economic policies and the pledge signing republicans are too stupid to understand it.

this country is stuck in limbo because of Keynesian-trickle (piss) down (your leg) - bullshit economic policies and the pledge signing republicans are too stupid to understand it. Originally Posted by CJ7

Do you not understand that Keynesian economic policies are the opposite of trickle down? Surely you're not advocating supply side, trickle down, Reagonomics.

CBJ7 does not understand much of anything. That should have been obvious by now. The Swedes are moving away from Keynesianism, because they have discovered it does not work.

CBJ7 does not understand much of anything. That should have been obvious by now. The Swedes are moving away from Keynesianism, because they have discovered it does not work. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

LMAO ... that post was the result of REALLY REALLY needing to go pee, the phone ringing and trying to finish a post ... pretty hard core multi tasking for a Friday

this country is stuck in limbo because of trickle (piss) down (your leg) - bullshit economic policies and the pledge signing republicans are too stupid to understand it.


there ya go girls

Well, that clears that up. ???

Well, that clears that up. ??? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

good, I almost assumed you were to dense to understand the effects of supply side ecomomic policy ...

good, I almost assumed you were to dense to understand the effects of supply side ecomomic policy ... Originally Posted by CJ7

Reagan doubled revenue. It worked for John Kennedy too.

Reagan doubled revenue. It worked for John Kennedy too. Originally Posted by joe bloe

Reagan raised the debt 189% and left Bush 1 a recession


ring any bells?


as for the revenue that he raised, while he was feeding the top dogs a few bones to keep them busy he raised taxes 7 times ..

look it up

Reagan raised the debt 189% and left Bush 1 a recession


ring any bells? Originally Posted by CJ7

The debt increase under Reagan was not the result of lowering taxes. Reagan lowered the tax rates and DOUBLED THE REVENUE! COG was right about you; you obviously don't understand much of anything. George HW Bush did not inherit a recession from Reagan. He inherited a growing economy.

On the other hand, George W Bush did inherit a recession from Clinton, and contrary to popular belief, Clinton did not inherit a recession from George HW Bush. The economy was growing at five percent in last quarter of George HW Bush's administration.


Reaganomics Vs. Obamanomics: Facts And Figures

Reagan's economic policies amounted to the most successful economic experiment in world history. The Reagan recovery started in official records in November 1982, and lasted 92 months without a recession until July 1990, when the tax increases of the 1990 budget deal killed it. This set a new record for the longest peacetime expansion ever, the previous high in peacetime being 58 months.

http://theccpp.org/2011/05/reaganomi...figures-1.html