Again our libs know the specifics about the communist Chinese military. Here's another source for the same story. Note that the PRC isn't listed as a source and the article even states specifically that the actual number of the PLA and it's employees is "unknowable".Good article Iaintliein.
Curiously, a quick google search for the years prior to the POSITOO does not include the military in the list, only companies. Wonder how much it's changed since the POSITOO took office?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17429786 Originally Posted by Iaintliein
Again our libs know the specifics about the communist Chinese military. Here's another source for the same story. Note that the PRC isn't listed as a source and the article even states specifically that the actual number of the PLA and it's employees is "unknowable".Again, you miss the point.
Originally Posted by Iaintliein
As a "card-carrying" "gubmint is too big" whiner, I think the Defense Department budget is way too large, and they try to do too much. One-third of the budget is waste, and another one-third is unnecessary. (That's just an estimate. But I bet it's close.)Then why don't you post this instead of the irrelevant bullshit you post?
I think we could have a leaner, stronger, more focused defense for much less money. We just have to get the defense contractors and oil industry out of the war making decisions. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Again, you miss the point.like the one we had before Pearl Harbor?
We have a bloated industrial military complex.
There is a group of folks on here and at Tea Rallies that call for smaller government...yet they have no clue as to wtf the biggest expenditure and which department employees the most people. Originally Posted by WTF