Brian Terry's Mother Comments on Fast and Furious

CuteOldGuy's Avatar
This is a Facebook post by Josephine Terry, Brian Terry's mother, on the Obama Administration's decision to cover up, er, I mean, claim executive privilege on the Fast and Furious documents.

http://www.reagancoalition.com/artic...ry-mother.html

It sounds like she'd like the documents disclosed.

God Bless you, Mrs. Terry!

WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 06-21-2012, 05:40 AM
Sounds like she needs to get with Pat Tillman's mother and see what a fucked up government we have on both sides of the aisle.
Why don't COF, Barleybrains, Whirly, or the other retards on the right ever mention such things?

Besides Tillman, I keep thinking about KBR electrocuting soldiers and civilians for profit and Halliburton supplying contaminated water to troops while Sean Hannity and Lush Bimbo scream about the President!
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
I'm appalled by that, too, Stevie, but that's not the issue before us. Try to pay attention. Or do you support our government giving guns to criminals and then covering it up?
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 06-21-2012, 02:17 PM
I'm appalled by that, too, Stevie, but that's not the issue before us. Try to pay attention. Or do you support our government giving guns to criminals and then covering it up? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
What I do not support is the selective outrage over each incident.


No different than turning the other cheek and saying nothing when say a white person commits a crime and then screaming bloody murder when you see a black person commit the same crime.

Makes you go Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm


CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 06-21-2012, 02:39 PM
the cover up is protecting the undercover agents that had dealings with the boys on the other side of the border who just happen to be known as ruthless killers of men, women, children, family members and friends of anyone hat fucks with them

sure 1 death of a border patrol officer is a bad deal, but would everyone feel better if the AG and the Prez turned over all the paperwork to the fucksticks in congress and a few names made it back to Mexico and the friends and families of the undercover agents were put on a hit list, then executed by the Cartels gang members on this side of the border ???


thats the issue COF et al.
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
That isn't even the reason they gave for the EP claim. They knew no one would buy that bullshit. I'm sure those names could be redacted. If they had asked Congress if those names could be redacted and the rest of the documents submitted, we wouldn't be here.

They are hiding criminal or embarrassing decisions made by the Administration. Holder should have been removed long ago.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 06-21-2012, 03:46 PM
That isn't even the reason they gave for the EP claim. They knew no one would buy that bullshit. I'm sure those names could be redacted. If they had asked Congress if those names could be redacted and the rest of the documents submitted, we wouldn't be here.

They are hiding criminal or embarrassing decisions made by the Administration. Holder should have been removed long ago. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

that your opinion

Im reasonably sure you wouldnt trust congress or any branch of this government to take your name off any documnetation if it meant your life or the lives of you family ... would you?
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
They do it all the time. That isn't the issue. You know they're hiding something that we, by right, should know. That's called a coverup. And it's illegal.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 06-21-2012, 03:52 PM
They do it all the time. That isn't the issue. You know they're hiding something that we, by right, should know. That's called a coverup. And it's illegal. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy


by right?

do tell what RIGHT YOU have to know the details of this or any undercover operation?
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
I have the right to know how lawless our chief law enforcement officer is. That's not protected by any privilege.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 06-21-2012, 04:15 PM
I have the right to know how lawless our chief law enforcement officer is. That's not protected by any privilege. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

show me in the constitution exactly where it gives you the RIGHT to have privy to any undercover sting past or present
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
You are changing the subject once again. Since you can't understand what is being said, I will not respond. Try Hooked-On-Phonics or something. You are really having trouble with comprehension and understanding. I think you can get help at a local community college. Call them today.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 06-21-2012, 04:49 PM
You are changing the subject once again. Since you can't understand what is being said, I will not respond. Try Hooked-On-Phonics or something. You are really having trouble with comprehension and understanding. I think you can get help at a local community college. Call them today. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

you clearly stated you have the right, I ask you to prove that you do have that RIGHT and you cahnge the subject entirely by deflecting to comprehension and understanding.


yeah well, go back and lay down .. if we need you we'll have whirlie whistle or something.
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
I'll respond to your question once you provide proof that you passed a reading comprehension course. Otherwise, it's a waste of time.