WSOD-what should Oprah do?

In 2005 Oprah had author James Frey on her show. He had written his autobiography "A Million Little Pieces". It was about his drug addiction, time in prison, and coming to terms with his life. Oprah made it a best seller. Cut to January 2006, Oprah finally accepts the truth that Frey lied his ass off in his book. Oprah had attacked viciously people like Bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, and Shawn Hannity and never apologized for being wrong. She did bring Frey back on her show so she would crucify him for the country.

It is 2012 and it becoming known that Obama lied in his autobiography on many things. As someone said, it is more a memoir than a biography. So Oprah had Master O on her show and made him famous too. Reporters on the night of his election said that they only knew him through his book. Will Oprah buy some time to crucify the liar in chief as she did the other liar?

You are a savant at Six Degree's of Separation!

Good point. Obama's so called autobiography has an additional problem. It appears likely that it was actually ghost written by unrepentant terrorist/Marxist, Bill Ayers. Comparisons have been made of the writing style of Ayers in his book "Fugitive Days" and "Dreams From my Father". The similarities are undeniable.

From American Thinker:

Carl Sandburg's poem "Chicago" which correctly reads "Hog Butcher for the World," and is incorrectly quoted in both Dreams and Fugitive Days as "hog butcher to the world." The similarity here is not only the exact same misquotation, but of all the poems to quote, of all the authors to quote, of all the lines to quote, why this author, why this poem, why this line?

An assumption implicit in the analysis so far is that William Ayers is the one true author of Fugitive Days. Mathematically the symmetry of the similarities discovered by Mr. Southwest could be applied to question the authorship of Fugitive much as it has been applied to question the authorship of Dreams. And the result of applying Bayes' Theorem would predict, if one assumes Obama wrote Dreams, then it is virtually certain that he wrote Fugitive. What the mathematics is really proving is both Dreams and Fugitive are written by the same author with a probability of 100% out to many significant figures. That author is Ayers, Obama, or some third person yet unnamed.


http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/...eams_from.html

Good point. Obama's so called autobiography has an additional problem. It appears likely that it was actually ghost written by unrepentant terrorist/Marxist, Bill Ayers. Comparisons have been made of the writing style of Ayers in his book "Fugitive Days" and "Dreams From my Father". The similarities are undeniable.

From American Thinker:

Carl Sandburg's poem "Chicago" which correctly reads "Hog Butcher for the World," and is incorrectly quoted in both Dreams and Fugitive Days as "hog butcher to the world." The similarity here is not only the exact same misquotation, but of all the poems to quote, of all the authors to quote, of all the lines to quote, why this author, why this poem, why this line?

An assumption implicit in the analysis so far is that William Ayers is the one true author of Fugitive Days. Mathematically the symmetry of the similarities discovered by Mr. Southwest could be applied to question the authorship of Fugitive much as it has been applied to question the authorship of Dreams. And the result of applying Bayes' Theorem would predict, if one assumes Obama wrote Dreams, then it is virtually certain that he wrote Fugitive. What the mathematics is really proving is both Dreams and Fugitive are written by the same author with a probability of 100% out to many significant figures. That author is Ayers, Obama, or some third person yet unnamed.


http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/...eams_from.html Originally Posted by joe bloe

Oh! But how could that be? Ayers was "just a guy from the neighborhood" no close relationship, nah, nothing to see here. . . move along.

Oh! But how could that be? Ayers was "just a guy from the neighborhood" no close relationship, nah, nothing to see here. . . move along. Originally Posted by Iaintliein

Obama was asked about his relationship with Bill Ayers only once. He was allowed to completely dodge the question. Obama has used the tactic of ridicule very effectively. Whenever someone brings up anything about Obama's forged birth certificate, membership in The New Party, phony social security number, connection to Bill Ayers, etc, they are ridiculed. People fear embarrassment more than almost anything.

The evidence that Bill Ayers wrote Obama's so called autobiography is substantial. No one in the media has the nerve to confront Obama with the allegation, for fear of being ridiculed. Ridicule was Saul Alinsky's favorite tactic.

Rule #5. RIDICULE IS MAN’S MOST POTENT WEAPON.
Ridicule and Mockery. They are very good at it. They use it often and liberally, and there is no defense against it. You can mitigate the damage by laughing along and joining in on the joke. But it’s tough. You’ve got to be quick on your feet and develop the hide of a rhino. But the damage is done. Whenever they throw a pie at a conservative speaker on campus? Think Alinsky. The speaker dodging the pie looks like a fool, and twice as foolish if he gets mad. While the pie thrower is just a prankster, and a hero. And nobody’s listening to the speaker anymore because they’re thinking about the pie! Crafty Libs. Alinsky rule #5 is par for the course for welcoming conservatives speakers to college campuses. Just google ‘pie’ ‘conservative’ ‘speaker’.

http://countercultureconservative.wo...alinsky-rules/

You Tea Nuts should go into astrology or Tarot card readings!

You'd make a fortune.

I have never seen snake oil salesmen such true believers in their products.

WDF, so you think Obama's auto[sic]biography is true?

pssssssst

while you morons sweat the little shit like books the dems are playing serious politics and making checkmate moves


I think Opra would tell you youre too stupid to notice and urge you to go and staple tea bags to your hats.

Even Huffy is running with the story!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...6pLid%3D171810

Jack Cashill, editor of Ingram's magazine and an author himself, has written a pretty solid piece about why he thinks Ayres wrote Obama's "auto" biography. It is called "Deconstructing Obama". He points out several instances from a writers prospective where "Obama" used terms and related events that he was not privvy to. Like using nautical metaphors. Ayres was a merchant sailor in his years on the run and in his own autobiography many passages sound very much what Obama has written about. Ayres book came out years before Obama's book. Another event was described by Obama is such detail, though it can be proven that he was not present at the event, Ayres was present at the event and described it in equal detail.

Let's face it, the dems were once again sold a bill of goods (Carter was another) and they bit into it hook, line, and sinker. As penance I think the Obama supporters should stay home this election... I think many of them will anyway.

. As penance I think the Obama supporters should stay home this election... . Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

You have an over inflated sense of self if you think Obama supporters care what you think.

WDF, so you think Obama's auto[sic]biography is true? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

an inappropriate question to ask a liberal...to them there is no truth and yet, at the same time, everything can be true if its true to you

It's true if he wants it to be true, regardless of the facts. That's liberal thinking right there. And then if they shout it loud enough, and long enough, and use multi-colored and multi-sized fonts, then it MUST be true. Therefore, the facts must be wrong.

Yep. I understand now.

an inappropriate question to ask a liberal...to them there is no truth and yet, at the same time, everything can be true if its true to you Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

The hard left is nihilistic. They don't believe there is any such thing as truth and that "nothing is either good or bad but thinking makes it so." It gives them the ability to tell lies casually with no sense of guilt. After all, they're not really lying, since nothing is true or untrue. Everything is just a matter opinion.

I'm going to rename the Affordable Care Act: "Ayerscare". Pelosi is pissed.