From Politico:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0712/78490.html
"An animated and sometimes irritated
Romney conceded that he continued to nominally head
Bain Capital — the subject of relentless attacks against him by Democrats — after 1999 and had the option to return to managing the daily operations of the firm when the Olympics was over. He also stuck to his guns regarding his tax returns, saying he would release two years’ worth (2011 and 2010) and no more."
It appears to me that the Mittster originally said he didn't head Bain Capital after 1999 but he is now saying he did. But it is ok that he did because he only did so "nominally!"
Hmmmmmm, I can't help but wonder how an accused bank robber would fare with a jury if he said that he only "nominally" robbed the bank? ROTFLMAO
So! In one breath, Romney is still claiming that he had nothing to do with Bain Capital after 1999. In his next breath an "irritated Romney conceded that he continued to nominally head Bain Capital."
Well, which one did you do Mittster? You either did or you didn't head Bain Capital after 1999. You can't have it both ways! Unless of course, you only did so "nominally." LOL
Gee, I wonder why the Mittster is refusing to release his tax returns for 1999-2009. Could it be that he only "nominally" filed his taxes between 1999-2009?
More later, this is starting to get very, very, very interesting!