Jarrett is Obama's political advisor; she thought there were political consequences should the mission fail (you remember the Carter fiasco in the desert?). It is documented in this recent book....why would Jarrett be involved in what is essentially a military operation is a more important question...
Who / what are her skills to determine "better timing" factors for a military raid ?
http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/29/ob...lerie-jarrett/
Originally Posted by Whirlaway
There is nothing odd about having political advisors (i.e., someone "non-military") involved in these types of decisions. All administrations have done it and will continue to do it, as they should. In our system of government, it is the civilians that control the military, not the other way around.
All military actions, by their nature, have political consequences, both domestically and internationally. Von Clausewitz was right when he said that "War is the continuation of politics by other means..."
BTW, that book is a POS hatchet job. It is ridiculously slanted. Consider this excerpt from the article:
"President Obama’s greatest success was actually his greatest failure,” Miniter told The Daily Caller Friday. ”
Leading From Behind,“ he said, traces the arc of six key Obama administration decisions, and shows how the president made them — and, often, failed to make them."
Really? Greatest failure? Bin Laden is DEAD. And none of our guys were killed. What part of that sounds like a failure? How does delaying a couple of months convert a success into a failure?
This is a lousy political tactic that Karl Rove championed. He did not originate it, as some claim, but he was surely a master practitioner. The tactic attempts to turn an opponent's perceived strength into a weakness. So, rather than remain quiet while an opponent is given credit for doing something right, you attack it head on and cast doubts about its accuracy or relevance. Sometimes you spread - or have anonymous operatives spread - outright lies about an opponent's successes or merits.
John Kerry served his country in Vietnam and that was a perceived strength. So Karl Rove - or someone doing his bidding - set about undermining Kerry's streength by starting up the Swift Boat stories to cast doubt upon what Kerry did.
You can debate whether or not the Swift Boating made a difference - probably not in all likelihood. Most peoples minds are made up early and it takes a stick of dynamite to dislodge them from their positions. Personally, I think it probably backfired on Bush. I know I found it distasteful and I am traditionally a Republican.
But it appears the same tactic is being used on Obama - attack one of his perceived strengths by throwing every piece of shit rumor or innuendo at it.