Since porn videos are so readily available on-line, it appears young'uns get their sex education by watching porn videos. And, in doing so, think what they see in porno films is universally accepted conduct. Since "actors" in porn films tend to be the cream of the crop (pun intended) in terms of endowments, I could see where young-uns could have feelings of inadequacy.
Starting a website where intimate couples could post their adventures in the bedroom and others could watch is interesting but in some instances, what happens in a dark bedroom should stay in a dark bedroom.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/09/fa...ref=technology
http://makelovenotporn.com
https://makelovenotporn.tv
- Cunnilinguists
- 09-08-2012, 07:03 PM
- pyramider
- 09-08-2012, 07:46 PM
So who started the websites?
- TexasDave555
- 09-08-2012, 08:33 PM
Dunno.. most of my friends and I learned about sex from vhs and porn mags..... 20+ years ago.
Same shit.. different media......
Feelings of inadequacy are self-inflicted and the product of ones self-esteem, not what one sees on a video screen. John Holmes and Long Dong Silver never gave me a complex...
Same shit.. different media......
Feelings of inadequacy are self-inflicted and the product of ones self-esteem, not what one sees on a video screen. John Holmes and Long Dong Silver never gave me a complex...
- joc1970
- 09-09-2012, 01:04 PM
Does providers really care about your penis size? Does hobbyists really care about pleasing a provider? I believe mostly no.
- pyramider
- 09-09-2012, 04:31 PM
Providers do care about penis size. They love my itty bitty pecker. If I had a third leg that would leave them sore for days they probably would hesitate to book me.
As for satisfying a provider ... not an issue here. I could not satisfy a woman if someone spotted me $10k and four inches.
As for satisfying a provider ... not an issue here. I could not satisfy a woman if someone spotted me $10k and four inches.
- daty/o
- 09-09-2012, 04:49 PM
- Poppa_Viagra
- 09-10-2012, 07:19 AM
Back in Jr High we were shown a sex education movie.
All drawings, no Nina Hartley, no photos.
No pictures of vagina or labia, only one cross-section drawing.
THEN, the piece de resistance. The first drawing of the male reproductive parts showed a schlong that would scare a donkey. Ron Jeremy would have been intimidated.
The whole motive was to make boys feel inadequate and afraid to show their vienna sausages, and (in separate showings of course) to make little girls fear the dick.
Just another benefit of 1950's puritanism (<---sarcasm).
All drawings, no Nina Hartley, no photos.
No pictures of vagina or labia, only one cross-section drawing.
THEN, the piece de resistance. The first drawing of the male reproductive parts showed a schlong that would scare a donkey. Ron Jeremy would have been intimidated.
The whole motive was to make boys feel inadequate and afraid to show their vienna sausages, and (in separate showings of course) to make little girls fear the dick.
Just another benefit of 1950's puritanism (<---sarcasm).
- txcwby6
- 09-10-2012, 03:01 PM
Had "the talk" with both of my boys. Uncomfortable? Yeah, a bit. But I'd rather be a responsible parent than "pray they watch the right porn."